Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Serious question about gun control

13»

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,619

    Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in

    don't twist. society is stacked this year from top to bottom. in a normal year gun control would have won at least 8 times.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,725 Standard Supporter

    Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in

    don't twist. society is stacked this year from top to bottom. in a normal year gun control would have won at least 8 times.
    Wait until Trump gets his own guys in there. 2018 is going to be special.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,511 Founders Club

    What else is new.

    Have you heard that Adult Skull Fucker was hacked?
  • JECARJECAR Member Posts: 586
    2001400ex said:

    JECAR said:

    2001400ex said:

    I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).

    I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?

    So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?

    Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?

    Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.

    Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
    People will still die in cars without seat belts. So why should we have laws requiring seat belts?

    See how stupid you sound?
    Your faggotry knows no bounds...

    So you think that making more gun laws is going to cause less crime and we'll have less shootings? Ask Chicago or D.C. how that's going for them.

    And by the way, comparing seat belt laws and gun laws to each other is like saying every LPT is the same with or with Griswold present and accounted for.


  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    JECAR said:

    2001400ex said:

    JECAR said:

    2001400ex said:

    I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).

    I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?

    So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?

    Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?

    Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.

    Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
    People will still die in cars without seat belts. So why should we have laws requiring seat belts?

    See how stupid you sound?
    Your faggotry knows no bounds...

    So you think that making more gun laws is going to cause less crime and we'll have less shootings? Ask Chicago or D.C. how that's going for them.

    And by the way, comparing seat belt laws and gun laws to each other is like saying every LPT is the same with or with Griswold present and accounted for.


    You clearly didn't read why I discussed seatbelts. Otherwise, nice rant.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,511 Founders Club
    edited October 2015
    I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.

    So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.

    So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.

    You can't read for comprehension either.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,511 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.

    So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.

    You can't read for comprehension either.
    You think I read your posts. Cute.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.

    So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.

    You can't read for comprehension either.
    You think I read your posts. Cute.
    Sounds like you care.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,533 Founders Club
    This thread is finishing skrong.
  • DontCallMeShirleyDontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    Wtf is a bazooka? Have they even been around since WWII.

    Great repeating Biden's talking point as always.
Sign In or Register to comment.