Serious question about gun control
Comments
-
You are stupid. And gullible.PurpleJ said:
Axe Ukraine.2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
You can't afford it.
-
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try. -
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there? -
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?2001400ex said:
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there? -
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.Blackie said:
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?2001400ex said:
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there?
