It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
Well there's your problem. You're damaging the property of others. Acts of aggression. Inappropriate. Simple, really.
I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).
I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?
So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?
Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
Well there's your problem. You're damaging the property of others. Acts of aggression. Inappropriate. Simple, really.
Read your previous comments and see how stupid you sound.
I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).
I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?
So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?
Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.
Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
People will still die in cars without seat belts. So why should we have laws requiring seat belts?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
Well there's your problem. You're damaging the property of others. Acts of aggression. Inappropriate. Simple, really.
Read your previous comments and see how stupid you sound.
Huh? How's that?
Seems like you're making a blanket assumption of malice on the part of anyone who would seek to obtain weapons. I'm not. "Shall not be infringed" and all that warm and fuzzy stuff.
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
Well there's your problem. You're damaging the property of others. Acts of aggression. Inappropriate. Simple, really.
Read your previous comments and see how stupid you sound.
Huh? How's that?
Seems like you're making a blanket assumption of malice on the part of anyone who would seek to obtain weapons. I'm not. "Shall not be infringed" and all that warm and fuzzy stuff.
The way you worded my comment on the tank was about my intent. 99.9% of gun owners don't intend to be aggressive upon purchase. Until they decide to shoot up a school. See the problem there?
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?
That's the stupidest thing ever.
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.
Nice try.
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.
See the problem there?
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.
Well there's your problem. You're damaging the property of others. Acts of aggression. Inappropriate. Simple, really.
Read your previous comments and see how stupid you sound.
Huh? How's that?
Seems like you're making a blanket assumption of malice on the part of anyone who would seek to obtain weapons. I'm not. "Shall not be infringed" and all that warm and fuzzy stuff.
The way you worded my comment on the tank was about my intent. 99.9% of gun owners don't intend to be aggressive upon purchase. Until they decide to shoot up a school. See the problem there?
Risk I'm willing to take. I'm not one to dictate life based on the actions of the 0.1%.
The Viet Cong and I were laughing at the assertion that small arms are useless against tanks and aircraft and then Hondo just got more stupid and stupid as it went along so we said fuck it let's go get high
Comments
Nice try.
See the problem there?
Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.
Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
See how stupid you sound?
Seems like you're making a blanket assumption of malice on the part of anyone who would seek to obtain weapons. I'm not. "Shall not be infringed" and all that warm and fuzzy stuff.