Serious question about gun control
Comments
-
I'm against seat belt laws too
-
don't twist. society is stacked this year from top to bottom. in a normal year gun control would have won at least 8 times.RaceBannon said:Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in
-
Wait until Trump gets his own guys in there. 2018 is going to be special.creepycoug said:
don't twist. society is stacked this year from top to bottom. in a normal year gun control would have won at least 8 times.RaceBannon said:Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in
-
Have you heard that Adult Skull Fucker was hacked?CuntWaffle said:What else is new.
-
Your faggotry knows no bounds...2001400ex said:
People will still die in cars without seat belts. So why should we have laws requiring seat belts?JECAR said:
Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?2001400ex said:I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).
I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?
So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.
Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
See how stupid you sound?
So you think that making more gun laws is going to cause less crime and we'll have less shootings? Ask Chicago or D.C. how that's going for them.
And by the way, comparing seat belt laws and gun laws to each other is like saying every LPT is the same with or with Griswold present and accounted for.
-
You clearly didn't read why I discussed seatbelts. Otherwise, nice rant.JECAR said:
Your faggotry knows no bounds...2001400ex said:
People will still die in cars without seat belts. So why should we have laws requiring seat belts?JECAR said:
Can we just make it illegal to go into a school and shoot everyone already?2001400ex said:I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).
I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?
So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
Fuck sakes man...wake up. No matter what fucking law gets passed, people are going to have guns...end of story. Here is a thought; why don't we just give everyone (without a criminal record) a gun. Let's train gen. pop. not to be a bunch of fucking sheep and defend themselves against psychopaths like that fuck face? I mean, we've clearly got the whole thing dialed in (PM @IrishDawg22 for further info on that) to the point that we are trying to make more laws that add to the law we already have.
Fuck Jonathan Smith...he should be fired.
See how stupid you sound?
So you think that making more gun laws is going to cause less crime and we'll have less shootings? Ask Chicago or D.C. how that's going for them.
And by the way, comparing seat belt laws and gun laws to each other is like saying every LPT is the same with or with Griswold present and accounted for. -
I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.
So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude. -
You can't read for comprehension either.PurpleJ said:I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.
So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude. -
You think I read your posts. Cute.2001400ex said:
You can't read for comprehension either.PurpleJ said:I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.
So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.
-
Sounds like you care.PurpleJ said:
You think I read your posts. Cute.2001400ex said:
You can't read for comprehension either.PurpleJ said:I like to use seatbelt laws to prop up gun control, even though they are two completely different situations. I do that.
So you're shooting a gun while wearing a seatbelt. Still a drive by murder dude.
