Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My Thoughts On The State of The 2015 Team

12357

Comments

  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,011

    I don't care if it's true because it's a bullshit excuse.

    We just lost to Cal at home. Sark never lost to Cal.

    Let that sink in.
    IF there's a year that we're going to lose to Cal, it's going to be a year where they have their best QB since Aaron Rodgers and we're starting a true frosh at QB.

    IF you're measuring stick is ensuring that a coach doesn't have something on his resume that Seven did, you'll probably cancel out just about every single coach in America.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    You seem to know the doog playbook very well. Too young, TUFF schedule, etc.

    I bet you Barked for Sark. In fact, I guarantee it.
    I never barked for sark. Again, answer the question or STFU. For the 4th time, show me a P5 team with the youth of UW's offense that had decent results. You and the rest of the knee-jerk crowd can't answer it because the answer is that no team can expect consistent offensive output with the youth on our team. It doesn't mean we can't want it, hope for it.....it means it's FS to expect it.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,011

    Blowing shit up was last season's excuse.

    It's year 2.

    Either you win or you GTFO.
    Right ...

    Which is why you're starting a true frosh QB, the backup RB is a true frosh, you have 3 true/RS frosh on the OL, and 2 WRs that are true frosh.

    This isn't the NFL where you can completely turn over a roster in an offseason (and even then it normally takes 2-3 years to completely turn the franchise over when it needs to be blown up.

    Basically all you are saying is that you have ZERO patience.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    Tequilla said:

    Right ...

    Which is why you're starting a true frosh QB, the backup RB is a true frosh, you have 3 true/RS frosh on the OL, and 2 WRs that are true frosh.

    This isn't the NFL where you can completely turn over a roster in an offseason (and even then it normally takes 2-3 years to completely turn the franchise over when it needs to be blown up.

    Basically all you are saying is that you have ZERO patience.
    Bull. Balls. Hit.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    I don't have intricate knowledge of every P5 team. You don't either so STFU. We are young, we get it. Nobody expects a really good offense. One that is merely below average would have at least 3-4 more wins. There really is no excuse for being worse than Oregon State, Colorado, etc on offense.

    The bottom line is that when Petersen was hired, if we were told he would be 10-8 with the worst offenses in the Pac 12, we would say fuck off. And yet that is where we are, but you and a few others still roll out the doog playbook. Praise for wins, criticism for losses. That's how this thing works. Petersen hasn't been good enough.
    I know it doesn't fit your narrative, but please show me where I'm rolling out of the doog playbook.

    I think a few on this board are rolling with the petulant toddler playbook. Knee jerk reactions and consistent overlooking of facts that don't fit their slant resulting in a FYFMFE tirade. It's as predictable as the biased media.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,011
    Few coaches are going to open the playbook in Game #1 of the year, on the road, at one of the more difficult places to win in the country, while starting a true frosh QB behind a relatively green line. You're going to play the game in a manner to get to the 4th quarter and not have your QB lose the game before that. The team was in position to send the game to OT (which I believe that they would have won if so) before a series of mental mistakes + a missed kick. I really don't have a huge problem in what was called during that game ... it sucked. But not surprising.

    The Cal game was just flat out idiotic play calling. Smith went to the Seven playbook of trying to get passing stats for his QB. Absolutely totally the wrong plan going into the game. I don't get the impression that Smith called the game not to lose in the Cal game. If anything, he played the game way too aggressively by going pass heavy when the game called for him to be run heavy.

    I'm all for rants and complaining ... but if you're going to do so stick with the facts and don't just run around kicking and screaming like your head has been cut off.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,737 Founders Club
    HuskyInAZ said:

    I know it doesn't fit your narrative, but please show me where I'm rolling out of the doog playbook.

    I think a few on this board are rolling with the petulant toddler playbook. Knee jerk reactions and consistent overlooking of facts that don't fit their slant resulting in a FYFMFE tirade. It's as predictable as the biased media.
    Chapter 1 - Doog Playbook
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Chapter 1 - Doog Playbook
    El Oh El.

    I think we are done here.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Houhusky said:

    Fuck are we (WE??!!) seriously already at the fucking point that we have forgotten that HHBs used to make fun of the 5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4>4-5 from Sark

    Now people on this fucking site are seriously going to pull out the argument that Petersens 4-5 and likely 3-6 are fucking better than the fucking drunk frat boy

    Fucking Shit Guys

    UW is about to increase our traditional annual 3 game losing streak to 4 this year after UW loses to USC, Oregon, and Stanford

    Petersen has gone 10-8 (4-6 in conference) so far and has had some of the worst offensive play (QB, Scheme, play calling, WRs, RBs, clock management... EVERYFUCKINGTHING) in the pac12...

    He is done a poor job here so far, incorrectly claiming that I will only be happy with 12-0 wont change that.

    Just so you HuskyFags in NY and AZ dont have to think of any more arguments...
    yeah but still... UW plays the hardest fucking schedule in the cuntry
    yeah but still... UW plays next to a lake that is obviously the fountain of youth
    yeah but still... UW had to play a QB that throws a changup with his eyes closed instead of real passes for the entire year last year
    yeah but still... just wait until (insert coach's name here) gets his guy in there
    yeah but still... you cant image the mess (insert previous coach's name here) left
    yeah but still... the best WR on the field needs to be moved to CB
    yeah but still... we have to force the ball to mickens since thats the best game plan
    yeah but still... our OL is young so we need to make our offense more complex to confuse the defense
    yeah but still... you cant expect to beat Cal now that they have Sonny Dykes
    yeah but still... How is Smith a bad coordinator
    yeah but still... players have all spoken about the difference between this coach and last year's coach
    yeah but still... next year is going to be special
    yeah but still....

    I always knew that the doogs would slowly fucking invade this bored, I just didnt think it would be so soon.

    We (We?) didn't lose three games in a row last year!!!!1111
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited September 2015
    Fuck are we (WE??!!) seriously already at the fucking point that we have forgotten that HHBs used to make fun of the 5-4>5-4>5-4>5-4>4-5 from Sark

    Now people on this fucking site are seriously going to pull out the argument that Petersens 4-5 and likely 3-6 are fucking better than the fucking drunk frat boy

    Fucking Shit Guys

    UW is about to increase our traditional annual 3 game losing streak to 4 this year after UW loses to USC, Oregon, and Stanford

    Petersen has gone 10-8 (4-6 in conference) so far and has had some of the worst offensive play (QB, Scheme, play calling, WRs, RBs, clock management... EVERYFUCKINGTHING) in the pac12...

    He is done a poor job here so far, incorrectly claiming that some people will only be happy with 12-0 wont change that.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    We (We?) didn't lose three games in a row last year!!!!1111
    maybe thats why we need to lose 4 in a row this year? I dont fucking make the rules
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Since I don't feel like writing DFI this week (thanks for not asking where it is, readers) can I just use this?
    Don't forget that you can't expect to beat Cal when they have their best QB since AARON RODGERS under center.
  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    Since I don't feel like writing DFI this week (thanks for not asking where it is, readers) can I just use this?
    feel free to use this, just mail me 10% of the royalties Derek is giving you for writing Duckfighter.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Tequilla said:

    Right ...

    Which is why you're starting a true frosh QB, the backup RB is a true frosh, you have 3 true/RS frosh on the OL, and 2 WRs that are true frosh.

    This isn't the NFL where you can completely turn over a roster in an offseason (and even then it normally takes 2-3 years to completely turn the franchise over when it needs to be blown up.

    Basically all you are saying is that you have ZERO patience.
    I don't have any
    HuskyInAZ said:

    I know it doesn't fit your narrative, but please show me where I'm rolling out of the doog playbook.

    I think a few on this board are rolling with the petulant toddler playbook. Knee jerk reactions and consistent overlooking of facts that don't fit their slant resulting in a FYFMFE tirade. It's as predictable as the biased media.
    Overlooking stats like 10-8 and the worst offense in the PAC 12 so far for the second year in a row? What is knee jerk about that? Blaming the players for not executing and the youth for FS schemes and play calling is straight from the doog playbook. Same for acting like everyone demands 12-0.
Sign In or Register to comment.