Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How Much Talent did Sark waste in 2013?
Comments
-
You mean like the 2008 Oregon game?haie said:
Sometimes the enemy gives the most honest and concise answer: UW quit after the Oregon game that year.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
7 if you dont count Idaho St.Gladstone said:This needs to be an HH article. Said article needs to be spread across the internets. Great thread. And it better fucking mention how Sark won 8 (not 9) with that team.
The other thing is the OL was completely healthy and experienced that season. It wasn't a dreckfest like the year before. -
Good thread. That team was loaded with playmakers. It did have some weak spots too. And Price, despite the hype was an average QB in the PAC 12.
Timu making the Bears would be interesting because everyone always said he sucked. -
ASJ was a 2nd round pickWilburHooksHands said:Shaq and ASJ were first round picks
-
He washed out of run plays too easily. That was incredibly frustrating to watch for the, what, 4+ years he started? He has pretty good instincts at defending the pass, but it was hard to forgive that when he dropped picks almost every time. As a matter of fact, with him and Shaq I hated UW's defense when backs managed to get 2nd level.RoadDawg55 said:Good thread. That team was loaded with playmakers. It did have some weak spots too. And Price, despite the hype was an average QB in the PAC 12.
Timu making the Bears would be interesting because everyone always said he sucked. -
That was really a pretty stacked team.
OL was mediocre at best talent wise and it was poorly developed. Other than that rosebowl level talent and experience. -
So Sark is a great recruiter.
That team folded against any one with a pulse just like the Huskies do. It's who we are
We? -
Would love to see a comparison to the 2000 team.
Big difference is the QB and OL was better back then. -
I'm not sure the QB was that much better. Tui was certainly a better runner. I think the difference was coaching, coaching, coaching.whlinder said:Would love to see a comparison to the 2000 team.
Big difference is the QB and OL was better back then. -
"Quite honestly, we were better than our record indicated."
-
Tui had innate leadership which Price did not and I don't think Tui's leadership was because of coaching. He had that independently and the coaching enhanced it. Price was a better passer but Tui raised the level of play for everyone around him.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not sure the QB was that much better. Tui was certainly a better runner. Quite Honestlywhlinder said:Would love to see a comparison to the 2000 team.
Big difference is the QB and OL was better back then.I thinkthe difference was coaching, coaching, coaching.






