How Much Talent did Sark waste in 2013?
Comments
-
I don't think it's fair to expect a QB to put a team on his back the way Tui did. KP was a great college QB.whlinder said:
Tui had innate leadership which Price did not and I don't think Tui's leadership was because of coaching. He had that independently and the coaching enhanced it. Price was a better passer but Tui raised the level of play for everyone around him.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not sure the QB was that much better. Tui was certainly a better runner. Quite Honestlywhlinder said:Would love to see a comparison to the 2000 team.
Big difference is the QB and OL was better back then.I thinkthe difference was coaching, coaching, coaching. -
Sarkisian has no idea how to make a cohesive team. He coaches teams comprised of individuals doing their thing. He has no idea how to weave the fabric into a solid and strong unit. What will be the next fool team to hire him?
-
5 if you don't count the 2 that Ross won singlehandedly.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
7 if you dont count Idaho St...Gladstone said:...And it better fucking mention how Sark won 8 (not 9) with that team.
-
Sark isn't terrible, he just needs the winds to blow his way perfectly to be successful.
I hate to sound like Puppy, but he has amassed serious talent in Compton. His teams will never respond well to adversity, but he might have enough fire power to steam roll the south.
Take your screenshots. -
I don't think he will "steam roll" the south, but he will be a contender with 9-10 wins a year.Doogles said:Sark isn't terrible, he just needs the winds to blow his way perfectly to be successful.
I hate to sound like Puppy, but he has amassed serious talent in Compton. His teams will never respond well to adversity, but he might have enough fire power to steam roll the south.
Take your screenshots.
He has too much talent not to.
But he doesn't have enough coaching talent or disclipne to beat the good coaches with similar talent, or the excellent coaches. -
What excellent coaches?topdawgnc said:
I don't think he will "steam roll" the south, but he will be a contender with 9-10 wins a year.Doogles said:Sark isn't terrible, he just needs the winds to blow his way perfectly to be successful.
I hate to sound like Puppy, but he has amassed serious talent in Compton. His teams will never respond well to adversity, but he might have enough fire power to steam roll the south.
Take your screenshots.
He has too much talent not to.
But he doesn't have enough coaching talent or disclipne to beat the good coaches with similar talent, or the excellent coaches. -
I don't disagree, he needs things to go perfectly because he doesn't have the skill to keep the team together in hard times.topdawgnc said:
I don't think he will "steam roll" the south, but he will be a contender with 9-10 wins a year.Doogles said:Sark isn't terrible, he just needs the winds to blow his way perfectly to be successful.
I hate to sound like Puppy, but he has amassed serious talent in Compton. His teams will never respond well to adversity, but he might have enough fire power to steam roll the south.
Take your screenshots.
He has too much talent not to.
But he doesn't have enough coaching talent or disclipne to beat the good coaches with similar talent, or the excellent coaches.
But to discount the talented individuals he has is doogish. LIPO.
Edit: Fenwick nailed it with his comment about individuals vs a cohesive team. Sark appeals to the dreamer athletes. Most of them have talent and professional aspirations, but when things don't go as scripted there is no foundation to help them persevere. -
A guy that is an honorable mention All Conference QB isn't a great college QB. Good and/or mediocre are acceptable answers.AZDuck said:
I don't think it's fair to expect a QB to put a team on his back the way Tui did. KP was a great college QB.whlinder said:
Tui had innate leadership which Price did not and I don't think Tui's leadership was because of coaching. He had that independently and the coaching enhanced it. Price was a better passer but Tui raised the level of play for everyone around him.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm not sure the QB was that much better. Tui was certainly a better runner. Quite Honestlywhlinder said:Would love to see a comparison to the 2000 team.
Big difference is the QB and OL was better back then.I thinkthe difference was coaching, coaching, coaching. -
Paging @SonnyDykesTierbsHsotBoobs said:
What excellent coaches?topdawgnc said:
I don't think he will "steam roll" the south, but he will be a contender with 9-10 wins a year.Doogles said:Sark isn't terrible, he just needs the winds to blow his way perfectly to be successful.
I hate to sound like Puppy, but he has amassed serious talent in Compton. His teams will never respond well to adversity, but he might have enough fire power to steam roll the south.
Take your screenshots.
He has too much talent not to.
But he doesn't have enough coaching talent or disclipne to beat the good coaches with similar talent, or the excellent coaches. -
I know you're being sarkastic but we're talking about QB, not safety.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You know who else had "talent"?whlinder said:Pickett had more talent that Tui and the same coach; what happened with him?
QBs impact the culture like no other position.







