Post Your 2015 W-L Predictions
Comments
-
4 and 7 with wins only over other teams with losing records.
You guys have no QB and a shitty OL.
WTF makes you think you'll score on anybody with an average or better Pac12 defense?
But I'm sure 2017 will be special. -
Not one of his better effortswhlinder said:
Midseason DFI formRaceBannon said:At Boise
Braxton Miller runs for 200 yards and passes for 300 as the Huskies look crisp in a 42-10 demolition of Boise College. Afterwards a humble Petersen denies any special satisfaction in beating his old team. "I like the players and miss coaching them. The fans can go fuck themselves."
Sacramento State - But why is Pool Boy a shitty AD? 77-17 win
Utah State - The Aggies are tougher than expected but the Huskies cruise to win #3 behind 350 yards rushing from Leon Washington.
California is still rated too high and the Huskies batter them 56-0 as Braxton Miller throws for 8 touchdowns in the first half. Fans are concerned that the second unit is held scoreless as Charlie Browning is picked off 8 times.
USC Thursday night. Sark thinks the game is on Saturday and is home drunk on his couch as the Trojans rally behind interim coach Pat Haden but fall short as the Huskies remain unbeaten with a 42-38 win
Oregon - Chris Petersen is carried off the field, the goal posts are torn down and Braxton Miller accepts the Heisman trophy as the Huskies snap a 27 year losing string by beatin the Ducks 78-3. "Urban Meyer gave me a few tips and Braxton thought he was in the Scarlet and Gray tonight" chuckled Petersen as he sipped a Mountain Dew to celebrate. UW moves to #1 in the nation behind Bama.
The Huskies then lose the last 6 games of the season but since nothing else matters Pool Boy signs Petersen to a life time contract at 10 million per year. And gives Romar the same deal in order to meet diversity goals at the University. -
RaccoonHarry said:
Not one of his better effortswhlinder said:
Midseason DFI formRaceBannon said:At Boise
Braxton Miller runs for 200 yards and passes for 300 as the Huskies look crisp in a 42-10 demolition of Boise College. Afterwards a humble Petersen denies any special satisfaction in beating his old team. "I like the players and miss coaching them. The fans can go fuck themselves."
Sacramento State - But why is Pool Boy a shitty AD? 77-17 win
Utah State - The Aggies are tougher than expected but the Huskies cruise to win #3 behind 350 yards rushing from Leon Washington.
California is still rated too high and the Huskies batter them 56-0 as Braxton Miller throws for 8 touchdowns in the first half. Fans are concerned that the second unit is held scoreless as Charlie Browning is picked off 8 times.
USC Thursday night. Sark thinks the game is on Saturday and is home drunk on his couch as the Trojans rally behind interim coach Pat Haden but fall short as the Huskies remain unbeaten with a 42-38 win
Oregon - Chris Petersen is carried off the field, the goal posts are torn down and Braxton Miller accepts the Heisman trophy as the Huskies snap a 27 year losing string by beatin the Ducks 78-3. "Urban Meyer gave me a few tips and Braxton thought he was in the Scarlet and Gray tonight" chuckled Petersen as he sipped a Mountain Dew to celebrate. UW moves to #1 in the nation behind Bama.
The Huskies then lose the last 6 games of the season but since nothing else matters Pool Boy signs Petersen to a life time contract at 10 million per year. And gives Romar the same deal in order to meet diversity goals at the University.
-
If you want sven's $20, you'll need to drive to west springfield, light yourself on fire and jump off a Mackenzie river bridge. The money should be right next to Todd Doxey's slightly decomposed corpse.topdawgnc said:81% sure the Huskies will win some, and they will lose some.
The games they win, we will be happy.
The games they lose, we will be ready to fire Peterman at the 50 yard line.
Sven will lose $20, Race will be Snarky, and Derek will take blatant money grabs every chance he gets. -
Easily YBEGladstone said:
Sark jumps into Haden's arms after the games but slips, tearing his ACL. -
The season is over.
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
The Boise State game is important to me, personally. As @RaceBannon said a while ago, that will tell us a lot. We have more talent, ostensibly we have great coaching. We should be able to beat a bunch of also-ran Pac-12 talent. The stadium will be electric, but so what? We know their personnel and we know what to expect.
The parallels with the 2010 BYU game are there. Conversely, Rick lost an opener to BYU as well and he went on to do okay (I mean, you know, just okay). So, I'm cautious to say that any one game tells the story.
I sort of expect @Gladstone to have it right if CCP is who we think he is (8-4 would also make sense). Talent matters and experience matters, but we have enough talent to be good against most of the teams on our schedule.
The teams we don't have talent to compete against are the elite teams like Oregon.
One thing I keep coming back to is that we were essentially a good team last year if we'd had decent QB play. The problem is, I don't know why we didn't.
Cyler (RIP) was awful. There's no disputing that. But so was everyone else, so that makes me think we were doing something weird with the QBs that made them all suck.
If we had gotten rid of extreme mental weakness and had decent QB play last year, we would've maybe only lost 2 games (UCLA and Oregon were the two teams that beat us solidly).
If we go 6-6, Petersen should be fired at the 50 yard line after the Apple Cup.seatownfunk said:
If you want sven's $20, you'll need to drive to north springfield, light yourself on fire and jump off a Mackenzie river bridge. The money should be right next to Todd Doxey's slightly decomposed corpse.topdawgnc said:81% sure the Huskies will win some, and they will lose some.
The games they win, we will be happy.
The games they lose, we will be ready to fire Peterman at the 50 yard line.
Sven will lose $20, Race will be Snarky, and Derek will take blatant money grabs every chance he gets. -
I love these threads.
Bookmarked -
Sept. 4 – at Boise State (Fri.) -- L 20-23
Sept. 12 – Sacramento State -- W 38-30
Sept. 19 – Utah State -- W 52-17
Sept. 26 – California -- W 48-47
Oct. 8 – at USC (Thu.) -- W 14-10
Oct. 17 – Oregon -- L 20-49
Oct. 24 – at Stanford -- L 17-24
Oct. 31 – Arizona -- L 24-40
Nov. 7 – Utah -- L 20-21
Nov. 14 – at Arizona State -- L 12-52
Nov. 21 – at Oregon State -- W 52-16
Nov. 27 – Washington State (Fri.) -- W 32-28 (We are back!)
We're going bowling boys!!!!!!!!!!! -
If we lose to Boise I'm tuning out the Huskies and turning my attention to the Mariners as they win the ALCS and waltz thru the world series
-
I think both Utah and Arizona may take steps back. Utah had all that coaching turnover on the defense and lost their good edge rushers, plus their offense is still shit. Arizona was really fortunate last year to beat Cal and UW, and it sounds like Rich Rod and Solomon are having problems this offseason. Az also lost 6 starters on defense.phineas said:Sept. 4 – at Boise State (Fri.) -- L 20-23
Sept. 12 – Sacramento State -- W 38-30
Sept. 19 – Utah State -- W 52-17
Sept. 26 – California -- W 48-47
Oct. 8 – at USC (Thu.) -- W 14-10
Oct. 17 – Oregon -- L 20-49
Oct. 24 – at Stanford -- L 17-24
Oct. 31 – Arizona -- L 24-40
Nov. 7 – Utah -- L 20-21
Nov. 14 – at Arizona State -- L 12-52
Nov. 21 – at Oregon State -- W 52-16
Nov. 27 – Washington State (Fri.) -- W 32-28 (We are back!)
We're going bowling boys!!!!!!!!!!!
I could see Cal surprising people. Goff is a good QB, they still got several good WRs and Lasco is a top5 P12 back. Their defense is shit and their schedule is brutal, but I think they'll be dangerous in shootouts and possibly pull of a big upset somewhere, hopefully against sarky-tits.
-
Good chit @BallSacked.
I agree on Cal, Arizona and Utah. I also think ASU won't be as good as projected.
Stanford looked like a different team at the end of the season. I know they lost guys on defense but they could be a real contender. -
10-2...take that to the bank. Shipoopi
-
The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
In all seriousness, I agree w/ a likelihood 7 or 8 wins
But the upward trajectory into 2016 and beyond? Bham!!!
Reminds me somewhat of 1999 going into 2000 -
Yeah I think Stanford wins the North, but Oregon will be right there.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Good chit @BallSacked.
I agree on Cal, Arizona and Utah. I also think ASU won't be as good as projected.
Stanford looked like a different team at the end of the season. I know they lost guys on defense but they could be a real contender.
In the south, I could see each of the Az/LA schools going on a run and winning it or being a so-so 7-5 squad, I'm going to be a homer and pick my Bruins to win it. They have the fewest questions and easiest schedule, but having a true Frosh at QB not ideal. Obv.
Agree on ASU. I think Bercovici will be solid, but they were truly dangerous offensively with all the option things that Kelly did at QB. That's not Bercos game. He's more of a pocket passer.
I don't think any Pac12 team threatens for a playoff spot. I also think the Conf takes it in the teeth out of conference:
ASU vs A&M in Houston
Oregon vs Sparty
Stanford/SC vs ND
Cal going to Texas
Beavs & Utes take on Harbaugh
I anticipate the league goes sub .500 in those games. May only be favored in about 2 or 3 out of those 7 games. Sven FagJ and Barrack Obannon will be insufferable with P12 hate this year. Cook it.
-
I think Bercovici will end up being one of the more overrated players in the conference. He should have thrown 4 picks when he came in against Arizona.
-
I dont care how good or bad cal and asu and stanford and utah will be. All that matters is whether or not uw can beat them. Im not getting my hopes up. Prove it, basically. I hope im wrong and we go undefeated and beat teams so bad kids are dropping out of school the next day. But im just gonna need to see it happen. Petersen has rope but after what, 15 years of shit, uw needs to prove they care about winning. IMO.
-
Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lolRoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
This is exactly right. I've been thinking that there is no reason Petersen can't do what Rich Rod did at Arizona. He didn't have a proven QB and lost Kadeem Carey. Their D in 2013 was middle of the conference. Yet they managed to win the south and go 10-4. And they've been top 26 in SRS three years in a row. Recall the year before they had Denker at QB who was terrible to begin with but improved during the second half of the season.Gladstone said:
Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lolRoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
Fuck it...I'll play
Sept. 4 – at Boise State (Fri.) -- L
Sept. 12 – Sacramento State -- W
Sept. 19 – Utah State -- W
Sept. 26 – California -- W
Oct. 8 – at USC (Thu.) -- L
Oct. 17 – Oregon -- L
Oct. 24 – at Stanford -- L
Oct. 31 – Arizona -- W
Nov. 7 – Utah -- W
Nov. 14 – at Arizona State -- L
Nov. 21 – at Oregon State -- W
Nov. 27 – Washington State (Fri.) -- W
No way do I see this team winning at Boise, SC, Stanford or ASU.
Arizona and Utah both could easily come in to Seattle and get a W especially AZ coming off 3 beatings.
-
If Stanford wins the North, four other coaches in the North should be fired.BallSacked said:
Yeah I think Stanford wins the North, but Oregon will be right there.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Good chit @BallSacked.
I agree on Cal, Arizona and Utah. I also think ASU won't be as good as projected.
Stanford looked like a different team at the end of the season. I know they lost guys on defense but they could be a real contender.
In the south, I could see each of the Az/LA schools going on a run and winning it or being a so-so 7-5 squad, I'm going to be a homer and pick my Bruins to win it. They have the fewest questions and easiest schedule, but having a true Frosh at QB not ideal. Obv.
Agree on ASU. I think Bercovici will be solid, but they were truly dangerous offensively with all the option things that Kelly did at QB. That's not Bercos game. He's more of a pocket passer.
I don't think any Pac12 team threatens for a playoff spot. I also think the Conf takes it in the teeth out of conference:
ASU vs A&M in Houston
Oregon vs Sparty
Stanford/SC vs ND
Cal going to Texas
Beavs & Utes take on Harbaugh
I anticipate the league goes sub .500 in those games. May only be favored in about 2 or 3 out of those 7 games. Sven FagJ and Barrack Obannon will be insufferable with P12 hate this year. Cook it.
-
If the shoe fits, wear it.Gladstone said:
Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lolRoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
Rich Rod was very lucky last year. Az was a Hail Mary and @TheChart away from 8-4.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
This is exactly right. I've been thinking that there is no reason Petersen can't do what Rich Rod did at Arizona. He didn't have a proven QB and lost Kadeem Carey. Their D in 2013 was middle of the conference. Yet they managed to win the south and go 10-4. And they've been top 26 in SRS three years in a row. Recall the year before they had Denker at QB who was terrible to begin with but improved during the second half of the season.Gladstone said:
Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lolRoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
Because Arizona won the South, four other coaches in the South should have been fired last year.BallSacked said:
Rich Rod was very lucky last year. Az was a Hail Mary and @TheChart away from 8-4.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
This is exactly right. I've been thinking that there is no reason Petersen can't do what Rich Rod did at Arizona. He didn't have a proven QB and lost Kadeem Carey. Their D in 2013 was middle of the conference. Yet they managed to win the south and go 10-4. And they've been top 26 in SRS three years in a row. Recall the year before they had Denker at QB who was terrible to begin with but improved during the second half of the season.Gladstone said:
Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lolRoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
9-3: losses to Oregon, ASU, and USC.
-
You really feel that this team is average? I see an horrible offense and probably an average defense. Am I missing something or is the rest of the conference really that bad. We lost a lot of talent.RoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
The conference is going to be down this year. New quarterbacks everywhere except for USC, Arizona, and CalAtomicDawg said:
You really feel that this team is average? I see an horrible offense and probably an average defense. Am I missing something or is the rest of the conference really that bad. We lost a lot of talent.RoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
That implies that the departing quarterbacks were good.greenblood said:
The conference is going to be down this year. New quarterbacks everywhere except for USC, Arizona, and CalAtomicDawg said:
You really feel that this team is average? I see an horrible offense and probably an average defense. Am I missing something or is the rest of the conference really that bad. We lost a lot of talent.RoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
-
Mariota was a once in a generation quarterback for OregonTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That implies that the departing quarterbacks were good.greenblood said:
The conference is going to be down this year. New quarterbacks everywhere except for USC, Arizona, and CalAtomicDawg said:
You really feel that this team is average? I see an horrible offense and probably an average defense. Am I missing something or is the rest of the conference really that bad. We lost a lot of talent.RoadDawg55 said:The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.
Hundley I never liked, but was very good for what UCLA wanted him to do
Everybody else was either average or slightly below, but most new quarterbacks do have a transition period in their first year. This is very evident especially in the OOC because it's their first live action as a collegiate player. Since conference strength is largely determined in week 3-4 after 90% of the OOC has been played, I feel the PAC 12 will be seen as weak because of the lack of experience at quarterback.
For example, Oregon beats Sparty and Stanford beats ND if they have the same quarterback play as last year. With new quarterbacks, I doubt it. Oregon won't get spanked, but they aren't winning in East Lansing without Mariota. Stanford I think will struggle as well for a while, at least on the offensive side of the ball.
