Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Post Your 2015 W-L Predictions

12357

Comments

  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    phineas said:

    Sept. 4 – at Boise State (Fri.) -- L 20-23
    Sept. 12 – Sacramento State -- W 38-30
    Sept. 19 – Utah State -- W 52-17
    Sept. 26 – California -- W 48-47
    Oct. 8 – at USC (Thu.) -- W 14-10
    Oct. 17 – Oregon -- L 20-49
    Oct. 24 – at Stanford -- L 17-24
    Oct. 31 – Arizona -- L 24-40
    Nov. 7 – Utah -- L 20-21
    Nov. 14 – at Arizona State -- L 12-52
    Nov. 21 – at Oregon State -- W 52-16
    Nov. 27 – Washington State (Fri.) -- W 32-28 (We are back!)

    We're going bowling boys!!!!!!!!!!!

    I think both Utah and Arizona may take steps back. Utah had all that coaching turnover on the defense and lost their good edge rushers, plus their offense is still shit. Arizona was really fortunate last year to beat Cal and UW, and it sounds like Rich Rod and Solomon are having problems this offseason. Az also lost 6 starters on defense.

    I could see Cal surprising people. Goff is a good QB, they still got several good WRs and Lasco is a top5 P12 back. Their defense is shit and their schedule is brutal, but I think they'll be dangerous in shootouts and possibly pull of a big upset somewhere, hopefully against sarky-tits.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Good chit @BallSacked.

    I agree on Cal, Arizona and Utah. I also think ASU won't be as good as projected.

    Stanford looked like a different team at the end of the season. I know they lost guys on defense but they could be a real contender.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    10-2...take that to the bank. Shipoopi
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    In all seriousness, I agree w/ a likelihood 7 or 8 wins

    But the upward trajectory into 2016 and beyond? Bham!!!

    Reminds me somewhat of 1999 going into 2000
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Good chit @BallSacked.

    I agree on Cal, Arizona and Utah. I also think ASU won't be as good as projected.

    Stanford looked like a different team at the end of the season. I know they lost guys on defense but they could be a real contender.

    Yeah I think Stanford wins the North, but Oregon will be right there.

    In the south, I could see each of the Az/LA schools going on a run and winning it or being a so-so 7-5 squad, I'm going to be a homer and pick my Bruins to win it. They have the fewest questions and easiest schedule, but having a true Frosh at QB not ideal. Obv.

    Agree on ASU. I think Bercovici will be solid, but they were truly dangerous offensively with all the option things that Kelly did at QB. That's not Bercos game. He's more of a pocket passer.

    I don't think any Pac12 team threatens for a playoff spot. I also think the Conf takes it in the teeth out of conference:
    ASU vs A&M in Houston
    Oregon vs Sparty
    Stanford/SC vs ND
    Cal going to Texas
    Beavs & Utes take on Harbaugh

    I anticipate the league goes sub .500 in those games. May only be favored in about 2 or 3 out of those 7 games. Sven FagJ and Barrack Obannon will be insufferable with P12 hate this year. Cook it.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,388 Standard Supporter
    I think Bercovici will end up being one of the more overrated players in the conference. He should have thrown 4 picks when he came in against Arizona.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I dont care how good or bad cal and asu and stanford and utah will be. All that matters is whether or not uw can beat them. Im not getting my hopes up. Prove it, basically. I hope im wrong and we go undefeated and beat teams so bad kids are dropping out of school the next day. But im just gonna need to see it happen. Petersen has rope but after what, 15 years of shit, uw needs to prove they care about winning. IMO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    RoadDawg55 said:

    The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.

    Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lol
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Gladstone said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    The Pac 12 seems pretty wide open. UW will be a flawed, average team. The question is if they can maximize the mediocrity to 8-10 wins (like Arizona last year) or if they win 5-7.

    Awesomed for "maximize the mediocrity" phrase lol
    This is exactly right. I've been thinking that there is no reason Petersen can't do what Rich Rod did at Arizona. He didn't have a proven QB and lost Kadeem Carey. Their D in 2013 was middle of the conference. Yet they managed to win the south and go 10-4. And they've been top 26 in SRS three years in a row. Recall the year before they had Denker at QB who was terrible to begin with but improved during the second half of the season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter