"False Temp Data Biggest Science Scandal Ever" London Telegraph
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
Comments
-
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "d2d said:
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true. -
Video provided for our illiterate members...2001400ex said:
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "d2d said:
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qRFz8merXEA -
You didn't even click on the link. You were confronted with information that called into question the very opinions you plunged deep into non-dischargeable debt to form, and dutifully attacked the source just like you've been trained. well done.2001400ex said:
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "d2d said:
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true. -
I blast people for not clicking the link when they quote from the link. Cause that's what I like to do.sarktastic said:
You didn't even click on the link. You were confronted with information that called into question the very opinions you plunged deep into non-dischargeable debt to form, and dutifully attacked the source just like you've been trained. well done.2001400ex said:
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "d2d said:
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true. -
So... you're in favor of student debt forgiveness, is what you're saying?
-
Are you saying the data behind the national debt is factual?sarktastic said:So... you're in favor of student debt forgiveness, is what you're saying?
-
Idiots like you two are the reason I get up in the morning.2001400ex said:
Are you saying the data behind the national debt is factual?sarktastic said:So... you're in favor of student debt forgiveness, is what you're saying?
-
-
I approve this message.d2d said:
Idiots like you two are the reason I get up in the morning.2001400ex said:
Are you saying the data behind the national debt is factual?sarktastic said:So... you're in favor of student debt forgiveness, is what you're saying?
-
AwesomeHoustonHusky said:
-
I like to get my news and information from comics. Cause that's what I like to do.CuntWaffle said:
AwesomeHoustonHusky said:
-
There are sources for each comment in the cartoon...I'd say that's better than most of the blather (i.e. The Stranger???) around here.
-
Full court pressing2001400ex said:
I like to get my news and information from comics. Cause that's what I like to do.CuntWaffle said:
AwesomeHoustonHusky said: -
And you keep turning the ball over.CuntWaffle said:
Full court pressing2001400ex said:
I like to get my news and information from comics. Cause that's what I like to do.CuntWaffle said:
AwesomeHoustonHusky said: -
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
I'm surprised you are surprised.CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
Dude, show some respect. He survived an ice age!CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
-
... and he thinks I'm Jesus. ("Commas are your friends.")dnc said:
Dude, show some respect. He survived an ice age!CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
d2d said:
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Im not surprised you had nothing to bring to the argument amongst these two idiots.ThomasFremont said:
I'm surprised you are surprised.CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
The heliocentric universe and I had a good chuckle at this. -
I brought the popcorn.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Im not surprised you had nothing to bring to the argument amongst these two idiots.ThomasFremont said:
I'm surprised you are surprised.CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
HTH -
You need subjects and verbs to make sentences.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Death has realized he has no argument and becomes grammar superiority guy.d2d said:
You need subjects and verbs to make sentences.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
-
Yet another straw man argument...you seem to be good at that. Its naïve to think anyone doesn't have a vested interest on either side...one of the reasons I give Steve McIntyre credit. He was a statistician who wasn't vested. Say what you want about scientists, but Mann and Hansen are complete frauds.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.
