"False Temp Data Biggest Science Scandal Ever" London Telegraph
Comments
-
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Im not surprised you had nothing to bring to the argument amongst these two idiots.ThomasFremont said:
I'm surprised you are surprised.CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do. -
The heliocentric universe and I had a good chuckle at this. -
I brought the popcorn.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Im not surprised you had nothing to bring to the argument amongst these two idiots.ThomasFremont said:
I'm surprised you are surprised.CuntWaffle said:
Jesus you are oldd2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
HTH -
You need subjects and verbs to make sentences.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
Death has realized he has no argument and becomes grammar superiority guy.d2d said:
You need subjects and verbs to make sentences.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.Southerndawg said:
What you posted was accurate. People whose incomes rely on research grants can and do get caught up in the business of procuring grants by whatever means necessary and can be amenable to working to conclusions that benefit the grantor(s). It's a real problem that is rarely questioned when the cause is primarily supported by those left of center.d2d said:
But am I still Jesus?Southerndawg said:d2d said:In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeoplelike togin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what theytodo. -
-
Yet another straw man argument...you seem to be good at that. Its naïve to think anyone doesn't have a vested interest on either side...one of the reasons I give Steve McIntyre credit. He was a statistician who wasn't vested. Say what you want about scientists, but Mann and Hansen are complete frauds.2001400ex said:
Yes so let's believe politicians that are bought off by corporations. And corporations who want to pollute. Over actual scientists.







