"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.
You didn't even click on the link. You were confronted with information that called into question the very opinions you plunged deep into non-dischargeable debt to form, and dutifully attacked the source just like you've been trained. well done.
"When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified. " London Examiner
"Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, "
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.
You didn't even click on the link. You were confronted with information that called into question the very opinions you plunged deep into non-dischargeable debt to form, and dutifully attacked the source just like you've been trained. well done.
I blast people for not clicking the link when they quote from the link. Cause that's what I like to do.
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.
Jesus you are old
Dude, show some respect. He survived an ice age!
... and he thinks I'm Jesus. ("Commas are your friends.")
In 1977 I attended an evening lecture at UW regarding the immediate coming of the next ice age. The speakers told us that virtually all scientists agreed, that it was unavoidable, and would start covering most of North America by 1990.
Sometimes pPeople like to gin up controversy so they receive perpetual grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they to do.
Comments
Man that sounds legit to me. Why would I ever question a blogger right? If its on the internet it must be true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qRFz8merXEA
There are sources for each comment in the cartoon...I'd say that's better than most of the blather (i.e. The Stranger???) around here.
Sometimes people like to gin up controversy so they receive grants from the government to study the bullshit they brought up. That's what they like to do.