Water is wet, and no-huddle exists to hide an anemic OL.
Asked if told 10 years ago he would be calling this type of offense, Sarkisian laughed. He said he should have been and also said that he would love to have played this style. In the past, he thought an approach where he tried to shorten the game would be the best route for the team. But, because of depth and skill personnel, that this best-suited the Huskies this season. In addition, he said it allows them to, “emphasize our skill players and de-emphasize up front.”Story. Who needs to recruit linemen, bitches?
Comments
-
So basically he doesn't feel the need to recruit OL at all. He's also wrong, should have ran this offense since day fucking one.
-
Fixed: "Who needs to recruit linemen, bitches?" asked dan cozzetto.
-
The DL is going to pay the biggest price for this pace, but of course Sark only considers the Oh-fence
-
Our defensive lines already usually suck, so I don't see why one should care if they now are tired while sucking?
-
During the first half there were a number of plays when boise state's O-line literally PUSHED our defense backward 5 yards, and their RB had nothing to do except walk behind them.
Our O-line? Thank God Sankey has good vision. He'll need it this year. -
Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.
You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.
Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').
I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior. -
Why does he make idiotic comments like he wants to de-emphasise up front? I'm sure that really makes OL recruits want to come to UW.
-
Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.He_Needs_More_Time said:Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.
You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.
Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').
I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.
#Wonderlicbitches
p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus. -
Jack is a moron but at least he's in an offense where you are showcasing his athletic ability. While in the pro style you had him act like a real QB which required someone who is smart and accurate and he is neither.Swaye said:
Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.He_Needs_More_Time said:Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.
You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.
Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').
I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.
#Wonderlicbitches
p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus. -
Also, this offense is much simpler. Fewer plays, smaller playbook, less to think about.Swaye said:
Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.He_Needs_More_Time said:Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.
You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.
Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').
I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.
#Wonderlicbitches
p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus.
Jack was usually pretty solid in the two minute drill because he didn't have to think, he just went out and played.
I think he'd do very well in this offense.




