Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Water is wet, and no-huddle exists to hide an anemic OL.

TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,821
in Hardcore Husky Board
Asked if told 10 years ago he would be calling this type of offense, Sarkisian laughed. He said he should have been and also said that he would love to have played this style. In the past, he thought an approach where he tried to shorten the game would be the best route for the team. But, because of depth and skill personnel, that this best-suited the Huskies this season. In addition, he said it allows them to, “emphasize our skill players and de-emphasize up front.”
Story. Who needs to recruit linemen, bitches?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    So basically he doesn't feel the need to recruit OL at all. He's also wrong, should have ran this offense since day fucking one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    Fixed: "Who needs to recruit linemen, bitches?" asked dan cozzetto.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    The DL is going to pay the biggest price for this pace, but of course Sark only considers the Oh-fence
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TitusPulloTitusPullo Member Posts: 146
    Our defensive lines already usually suck, so I don't see why one should care if they now are tired while sucking?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    During the first half there were a number of plays when boise state's O-line literally PUSHED our defense backward 5 yards, and their RB had nothing to do except walk behind them.

    Our O-line? Thank God Sankey has good vision. He'll need it this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.

    You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.

    Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').

    I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,576 Founders Club
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.

    You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.

    Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').

    I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.

    Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.

    #Wonderlicbitches

    p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Swaye said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.

    You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.

    Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').

    I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.

    Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.

    #Wonderlicbitches

    p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus.
    Jack is a moron but at least he's in an offense where you are showcasing his athletic ability. While in the pro style you had him act like a real QB which required someone who is smart and accurate and he is neither.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,576 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    Swaye said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Sark is full of shit how this is the first year he could use this offense.

    You are telling me that Chris Polk, Jermaine Kearse, Devin Aguilar, Goodwin, James Johnson(when he was good), Middleton and Lockner wouldn't kick ass in this offense?! GTFO with that nonsense.

    Rolling with the prostyle the first four years was stupid. I guess better late than never and I really hope years from now we'll look back at Sark changing this offense as the turning point(like James changing defense vs OSU in 89', Neuheisel going to option vs Colorado in 99').

    I hope it works out but I'm still a little bummed he didn't go to this when it was so obvious especially by the time Jack was a senior.

    Agree with most of what you wrote, except I am not sure Lockner could have reacted mentally to the defensive reads quickly enough...it requires quick progressions, something he still struggles with, because he is basically dumb as a brick.

    #Wonderlicbitches

    p.s. Then again, Massoli was good at it, and he has GOT to be dumber than Montlake Jesus.
    Also, this offense is much simpler. Fewer plays, smaller playbook, less to think about.

    Jack was usually pretty solid in the two minute drill because he didn't have to think, he just went out and played.

    I think he'd do very well in this offense.

    You might be right. I keep thinking it is tough to make those read and react decisions quickly in this offense, but perhaps it is more natural to a dummy like Jack to just play sandlot ball and use instincts, which he actually WAS good at.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dick_BDick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    why does Passion want to blame the oline coach for the poor line? Coz recruits arizona. O-line isn't his responsibility. Now if Cozetto sucks as an oline coach (which I havent heard) and big steakeaters (lol) dont want to play for him, that's on Sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Lots of good points in this thread.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Why do you guys call Sark Jack?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    Dick_B said:

    why does Passion want to blame the oline coach for the poor line? Coz recruits arizona. O-line isn't his responsibility. Now if Cozetto sucks as an oline coach (which I havent heard) and big steakeaters (lol) dont want to play for him, that's on Sark.

    Adrian Klemm laughed at this one.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dick_BDick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    Passion said:

    Dick_B said:

    why does Passion want to blame the oline coach for the poor line? Coz recruits arizona. O-line isn't his responsibility. Now if Cozetto sucks as an oline coach (which I havent heard) and big steakeaters (lol) dont want to play for him, that's on Sark.

    Adrian Klemm laughed at this one.
    answer the fucking question! Cozz coaches up what he is given. Since we don't have Klemm, and won't get him anytime soon (HE HAS A CONTRACT) how does his name answer the question?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited September 2013
    Where have you been? It's pretty well known that other coaches negatively recruit against cozzetto, and kids don't want to play for him. Why? Because he is a mindless screamer, not a teacher.

    In contrast, Adrian Klemm IS a great recruiter of offensive linemen, no matter where they come from. Kids want to play for him because he bonds with them, and he uses it to his advantage in recruiting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AuburndawgAuburndawg Member Posts: 362
    We won 38-6. Gained almost 600 yards and gave up zero TDs.

    But the offensive and defensive lines are terrible and the coach is an idiot.

    If you saw Sark walking across Lake Washington some of you would say it just shows he can't swim.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trackertracker Member Posts: 866
    Auburndawg said:

    We won 38-6. Gained almost 600 yards and gave up zero TDs.

    But the offensive and defensive lines are terrible and the coach is an idiot.

    If you saw Sark walking across Lake Washington some of you would say it just shows he can't swim.


    Or the lake lacked depth.

    :)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,209 Founders Club
    Lake Washington is awfully young
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.