Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This is the year of no excuses
Comments
-
The day he was hired
-
This. Washington managed to go cheap (by refusing to pay top dollar) and overpay Sark relative to what his worth was at the same time.section8 said:The day he was hired
I think Aubs ridiculed me for making that point at the time.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
-
Had to put Ty in there as I'm sure you made that point back then too.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
This. Washington managed to go cheap (by refusing to pay top dollar) and overpay Sark,section8 said:The day he was hired
Tyrelative to what his worth was at the same time.
I think Aubs ridiculed me for making that point at the time.
Lather, rinse, repeat. -
Nebraska 56 at Washington 21Auburndawg said:So when did you career negas decide Sark needed to be fired? Just curious.
Husky Legend Jack Lockner 4-20 2 ints
Nebraska had 3 100 yard rushers -
The podcast after that loss was pretty entertaining and still holds true today.TheKobeStopper said:
Nebraska 56 at Washington 21Auburndawg said:So when did you career negas decide Sark needed to be fired? Just curious.
Husky Legend Jack Lockner 4-20 2 ints
Nebraska had 3 100 yard rushers -
What good recruiting classes are u talking about? I personally don't count getting a bunch of 4 star qb's, wr's, and cb's as good recruiting classes
-
How many games did his coaching cost UW in 2009? 3 that I can think of: ASU, UCLA and ND.RoadDawg55 said:
I know you thought that at the time, but that team was bound to lose some close games. I do agree that ASU and UCLA games were poorly coached, but was it something to be really alarmed about? Are you alarmed by Mora and UCLA getting blown out by Cal last year? How about the UCLA bowl game?DerekJohnson said:
There were warning signs in October 2009RoadDawg55 said:
That was the first real warning sign, but he redeemed himself with the 4 game winning streak to end the year.Dawgtona said:
Stanford 2010Auburndawg said:So when did you career negas decide Sark needed to be fired? Just curious.
Some mistakes had to be expected. All in all, he did fine in 2009. After that season, if you would have told even the most ardent Sark supporters that in 2013, we would be ranked 45th in the coaches poll and 3rd or 4th in the North, they would want Sark fired. That's the problem.
I'll play along and say the team was 0-12 and need to learn how to win and can concede that maybe, 2-1 is a likely result against those 3 teams. Hell, I'll give you 1-2.
The point is that the Fat Armenian gave away likely UW wins and should have finished .500 or better in his first season.
-
The LSU game made me okay with it. The Arizona game had me making drunken posts on FB demanding it. There's Just no excuse for getting beaten down by five touchdowns by a team with the same talent level.
-
agreed.Swaye said:
That four game win streak was not exactly a murders row of college football titans.RoadDawg55 said:
That was the first real warning sign, but he redeemed himself with the 4 game winning streak to end the year.Dawgtona said:
Stanford 2010Auburndawg said:So when did you career negas decide Sark needed to be fired? Just curious.
That was one of the worst four-game winning streaks in the history of sports that aren't beisbol. -
yeah but stillTheKobeStopper said:
Nebraska 56 at Washington 21Auburndawg said:So when did you career negas decide Sark needed to be fired? Just curious.
Husky Legend Jack Lockner 4-20 2 ints
Nebraska had 3 100 yard rushers





