What SoftyFS is hearing
Comments
-
The difference is that I can't see Ross blowing up run plays like Peters could. It's rare to have a corner that hits as hard as he does and has all the cover abilities.Tequilla said:No question that expecting Ross To play at Peters' level this week probably isn't going to happen.
That being said there are opportunities to cover what you are losing w Peters and Ross at least athletically will be able to help there.
One thing people need to not anchor to is that the positions that players have been playing at are necessarily their best positions. It's possible that RB is Shaq's best position. It's possible that Ross' best position may be as a DB. -
Another Twatter gem from today... Doog of the week competition is fierce
-
Twatter never more appropriate.MrsPetersen said:Another Twatter gem from today... Doog of the week competition is fierce
-
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
-
TheGlove said:
Can we get a Huskie Roadkill List going:
Stringfellow
Stringfellow
Stringfellow
Hobert
Stringfellow
? -
The best response to twats like this that claim he won't recruit inner city kids is the following:MrsPetersen said:FYI guys, Peterman will be fired in two years according to this fucktard on Twatter:
CHRIS PETERSEN RECRUITED NAIJIEL HALE... WHO IS THE SON OF NATE DOGG -
Turns out his kid had the crud.CuntWaffle said:He made this decision for his newly born kid. He knew that he could get ready for the draft instead of having to play for a church school coach.
I'm glad he started thinking about his family. -
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do? -
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts. -
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts. -
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
Victoria Hayward (UW Softball player who just graduated) Chimes in:
-
Probably. It depends who else is available to play QB.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree. -
Now it's a whoooosh.dnc said:
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree.
C'mon man. -
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
-
Praise be to Locknah!ThomasFremont said:
Now it's a whoooosh.dnc said:
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree.
C'mon man. -
Based on what?SpoonieLuv said:
Fucktard Alert: I think we will be a Top 10 team circa the time @NWSportsNerd is thinking Peterman will be fired.MrsPetersen said:FYI guys, Peterman will be fired in two years according to this fucktard on Twatter:
-
Bill the Beerman's opinion is as relevant as hers.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Victoria Hayward (UW Softball player who just graduated) Chimes in:
-
Why don't we let her tell us exactly what she is willing to do for that opportunity before we judge.RoadDawg55 said:
Bill the Beerman's opinion is as relevant as hers.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Victoria Hayward (UW Softball player who just graduated) Chimes in:
-
Hope and change?RaceBannon said:You gotta give Petersen a chance to do it his way. We know we need change here. Dude brah is taking the week off. Pete is cleaning up his mess he left here
-
-
That's the kind of logic that got Locker drafted 7th.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
No longer delivers. This thread.
-
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Victoria Hayward (UW Softball player who just graduated) Chimes in:
It kills me seeing guys headed to the league (NFL, NBA, MLB, etc) be so selfish. The things I would do for that kind of opportunity...
— Victoria Hayward (@VictoriaHayward) November 6, 2014
Someone should ask her exactly what she would do. -
You called it a while ago. It's like Revenge of the Nerds UITB.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Hee hee. Fuck whats happening to this boredMrsPetersen said:
He probably pulled an all-nighter playing the new Call of Duty, he's all hopped up on Mountain Dew and Nacho Cheese Doritos.CheersWestDawg said:I'm more shocked that Jewd was up at 7:19 am.
-
You tell me. You fell for it twicedoogsinparadise said:
Hope and change?RaceBannon said:You gotta give Petersen a chance to do it his way. We know we need change here. Dude brah is taking the week off. Pete is cleaning up his mess he left here
-
The Bulge in my sweatpantsGreenRiverGatorz said:
Based on what?SpoonieLuv said:
Fucktard Alert: I think we will be a Top 10 team circa the time @NWSportsNerd is thinking Peterman will be fired.MrsPetersen said:FYI guys, Peterman will be fired in two years according to this fucktard on Twatter:
also, 98-15 buys a little credit around these parts.
