Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey SEC sac sniffers, explain #11 Georgia?

124

Comments

  • no_uh
    no_uh Member Posts: 776
    edited November 2014
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited November 2014
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Have zero respect for buttfuck SEC proponents like purplej. Explain yourself bitc h. Jihad to your worthless SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC. Fucking joke. How bout that #4 Ole Miss who jus t got pistle whipped ass fucked by LSU (u nranked). Bring some explanations. Dont bring up A uburn South Carolina last week. No need.

    Saying LSU was unranked before the Ole Miss game when they were ranked in both poles is OBK fucking stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Georgia sucks.

    As @no_uh‌ said, the Pac-12 sucks more because WSU 28, Utah 27.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PurpleJ said:

    I will wait for a SEC team to win the National Championship this year before addressing the issue any further.

    UW would be lucky to be 7th in the SEC West.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • H_D
    H_D Member Posts: 6,098
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I will wait for a SEC team to win the National Championship this year before addressing the issue any further.

    UW would be lucky to be 7th in the SEC West.

    How many teams are in the SEC West? We'd be after that. Unless Cal came along with us, then...well, you know the rest.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Yes.

    Here's some non-biased evidence for you:
    http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
    http://www.andersonsports.com/football/ACF_frnk.html
    http://www.colleyrankings.com/currank.html
    http://prwolfe.bol.ucla.edu/cfootball/ratings.htm

    Duke is the overrated team. But Doogs like you hate facts, as always.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,317 Standard Supporter
    no_uh said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.
    Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    no_uh said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.
    Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.
    And I answered your question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,317 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2014
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    no_uh said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.
    Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.
    And I answered your question.
    Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RavennaDawg
    RavennaDawg Member Posts: 846
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    no_uh said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Slocus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Duke is 7-1!

    This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.
    They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.

    Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
    Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.
    Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.
    And I answered your question.
    Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.

    Didn't everyone predict this?

    When you are #4, that means you are not as good as numbers 1, 2, or 3.

    So far they have lost to 2 and 3, and play #1 in four weeks. They should loose that one too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter