Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hey SEC sac sniffers, explain #11 Georgia?
Comments
-
At least their losses aren't at BC and at home to ASU like the current Pac-12 leaders.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Oh. -
USC is 4th in the South Boobs. C'mon.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
At least their losses aren't at BC and at home to ASU like the current Pac-12 leaders.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Oh. -
Oh shit, I forgot they lost last week.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
USC is 4th in the South Boobs. C'mon.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
At least their losses aren't at BC and at home to ASU like the current Pac-12 leaders.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Oh.
Not my best effort considering how awesome it was. -
Actually they beat #2, when they were #1. With a healthy Treadwell they'd knock off State too, but now I'm not so sure.RavennaDawg said:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Didn't everyone predict this?
When you are #4, that means you are not as good as numbers 1, 2, or 3.
So far they have lost to 2 and 3, and play #1 in four weeks. They should loose that one too. -
A healthy Treadwell (RIP) didn't even have enough speed to beat Auburn's defense to the end zone.dnc said:
Actually they beat #2, when they were #1. With a healthy Treadwell they'd knock off State too, but now I'm not so sure.RavennaDawg said:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Didn't everyone predict this?
When you are #4, that means you are not as good as numbers 1, 2, or 3.
So far they have lost to 2 and 3, and play #1 in four weeks. They should loose that one too. -
I think the top 5 are MSU, AU, LSU, UM, and UA.dnc said:
Actually they beat #2, when they were #1. With a healthy Treadwell they'd knock off State too, but now I'm not so sure.RavennaDawg said:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Fair enough. It's not like all those sites are unbiased though. Also Miss. has two losses, as I predicted.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I answered your question.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Try reading more carefully. I never said Duke should be top five. I asked why they should be 20 spots below Miss. Try to keep up.no_uh said:
Jesus. If East Carolina didn't lose today would we have to listen to arguments about why ECU should be in the top 5 as well? Who was Duke beaten again? It took them 2OT to beat a trash Pitt team today. Wake the fuck up.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
They've become respectable. Are they great? No. ESPN and Rinaldi ignore them though because ACC. ACC ass kissing is only acceptable in basketball.Slocus said:
This is how I know something is wrong with football this year.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Duke is 7-1!
Now here's the question for Race, Purple J, and Sven. Is Ole Miss really 20 spots better than Duke? Is the SEC that much better? Both are usually bottom feeders with one conference loss. Answer the question. Don't bring up dubious NC streaks
Didn't everyone predict this?
When you are #4, that means you are not as good as numbers 1, 2, or 3.
So far they have lost to 2 and 3, and play #1 in four weeks. They should loose that one too.



