Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to SunnyDodger

2»

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Not the first time Super Mario has given me wood.

    #summerof'87
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    pawz said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    pawz said:

    If you looked up 'ultimate doog' in the Dictionary, you would see a picture of SunnyDodger.




    image

    Hey now, this could be perceived as offensive to the retards that post here.

    Just tell PGOS he can wear his superman-cape to bed tonight. He'll be fine.



    The obsession continues...


    Thanks for plagiarism my shit fucko.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    SunnyDodger said:

    You are misrepresenting my statements, a common tactic used on outlets like the huskyfan podcast. I am not saying that Sark was the best coach in the world, or that he would be good at USC, what I said is that he did a really good job here, and to deny that is denying recent success of the program which hurts it because then you fall back to Willingham for reference. This is not the time or place to debate the job he is doing at USC, my concern is with UW.

    From AZ Duck

    "4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4"

    Sark's conference record over 5 years. Where's the improvement. He took thee conference record from 0-9 to 4-5 to 5-4. What about the last three years? Sark wasn't horrible but he was mediocre in every way possible. Dawgman, propped Sark up like he was a savior, where most people here knew after year three, he wasn't going to take UW to the next level. It sounds like you are fine with constant 6-8 win seasons, but many here want to see constant 10 wins seasons like my team enjoys.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    SunnyDodger said:

    I am not saying that I want mediocrity but you have to look at everything in context. Sark had a consistent conference record that was mediocre, BUT outside of the Ducks and Stanford who had better conference records that were showing more improvement? I would like to see that list, I would assume it is pretty small and mainly include either USC or UCLA which is good company. 5-4 or 4-5 are what most decent programs are going to do in this conference teams don't regularly win 6-9 pac 12 conference games outside of LA.

    As for the Huskyfan podcast, I understand you are a fan podcast, but you have a responsibility to the fans since you are attached to a Husky outlet like this website. The fans use outlets like this webpage and that podcast to gather information about the team and the program and they get a sense of the mood of the fan base and the information coming out of the program. I have sources inside the program I am fully available to forward information that will add to the analysis.

    So you are ok with UW being ranked 4th through 6th consistently in this conference? Would the fan base be happy with that in 1991? 1992? heck, 2000? 2001?. You are allowing a horrible coach in Ty Willingham and the ghost of 0-12 to skew your perspective. This team has not improved since 2011. Can you agree with that? You are out of the shadows, but now isn't the time you guys should be complacent.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    SunnyDodger said:

    No, please show me a time when UW was consistenly 1 or 2 in the conference? please look at the history and outside of a 10 year stretch from 1984 to 1994, our history mimics the current Sarkish trends.

    Umm from 1978 to 2002, UW finished in the top 3 of the conference 22 times. 22 out of 25 years. I believe first or 2nd 18 times.

    And Petersen came to UW because he believes he can build a program that can compete for national championships.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited October 2014
    SunnyDodger said:

    I said 1st or 2nd not 3rd and the caveat was to exclude the ten years from 1984 to 1994 since that appears to be the exception to the rule

    That still leaves 1st or 2nd in conference 8 out of 14 years after taking away years 84'-94' from 78' until 02'. That's still a very dominant run. I will give you that the current team is much better than the years under Ty, and the end of the Neuheisel era, but the improvement has stalled. I'm sorry, but if you are not getting better, you are getting worse, because other teams around you are getting better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    SunnyDodger said:

    how do you see the improvement as stalled, we won 9 last year didn't we? and that was an improvement from the previous years.

    Sark won 8. Don't gift him anything.

    Mendenhall would have plungered the Huskies last year with Sark hungover at the helm. With Tui coaching the game it was Sankey, Sankey and more Sankey.

    Sark + 37 bubble screens = Bowl Loss and an 8-5 season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 49
    walk off
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    SunnyDodger said:

    That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.

    Who fucking cares about Sark at UW anymore? Even most Sark supporters on Doogman and in the media admit that Petersen is a clear upgrade. Why do we need to discuss? Move on to another topic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    SunnyDodger said:

    That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.

    Who fucking cares about Sark at UW anymore? Even most Sark supporters on Doogman and in the media admit that Petersen is a clear upgrade. Why do we need to discuss? Move on to another topic.
    Peterman's 5-4 > Sark's 5-4
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Swaye said:

    SunnyDodger said:

    That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.

    Jesus Fucking Christ. Is it Friday yet?
    No
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    MikeDamone said:

    Swaye said:

    SunnyDodger said:

    That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.

    Jesus Fucking Christ. Is it Friday yet?
    No
    Chinese time zone disagrees
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    greenblood said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Swaye said:

    SunnyDodger said:

    That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.

    Jesus Fucking Christ. Is it Friday yet?
    No
    Chinese time zone disagrees
    fucking asians are always one step ahead of us

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,665 Standard Supporter
    SunnyDodger said:

    No, please show me a time when UW was consistenly 1 or 2 in the conference? please look at the history and outside of a 10 year stretch from 1984 to 1994, our history mimics the current Sarkish trends.

    It's hard for any team to sustain that, but we're stuck in 7-5 and 8-4 mode. Don James had his down years in the late 80s, but there were the corresponding top ten and or BCS level bowl years in the late 70s, early 80s and early 90s.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuv
    SpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,463
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    SunnyDodger said:

    No, please show me a time when UW was consistenly 1 or 2 in the conference? please look at the history and outside of a 10 year stretch from 1984 to 1994, our history mimics the current Sarkish trends.

    It's hard for any team to sustain that, but we're stuck in 7-5 and 8-4 mode. Don James had his down years in the late 80s, but there were the corresponding top ten and or BCS level bowl years in the late 70s, early 80s and early 90s.
    Don James never had to play a ranked Utah. How would a James team compete on the road with that Utah student section?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    SunnyDodger said:

    I actually detail this in my first podcast, please have a listen:

    http://uwdawgfan.wix.com/huskies#!podcasts/c21nl

    The guys on the huskyfan podcast, use perverse language to deride other outlets and other fans (again I went over this in the podcast), they criticize any critical analysis of the team, they are in love with cyler miles and deride anyone who thinks he is not the guy, etc, again all of this is in the podcast. their hatred of sark, dawgman, softy, hugh, etc are another aspect of this which divides the fan base and it is also detailed in the podcast.

    damn thing is still live
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleBaze
    PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,325 Founders Club
    GRUNDLE STOp
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter