John Bolton Indicted
Comments
-
We know you have no principles so your arguments have no merit. All that matters is power by your own standards comrade, and we have the power. So now what?
-
Bot admits she’s not up to the challenge.
Points for self-awareness though.
-
Obviously you do care about Bolton, you are here in a Bolton thread crying about anything you can to point a finger at everyone else and it's clearly got you triggered
Make your case against Hegseth!
-
I care that Daddy prosecutes his political enemies only. John Bolton might actually be guilty of something though.
Imagine not being aware of Pete Hegseth’s drunken war plan chat. Is this an act or are you entirely out of touch?
-
You already called me out directly or indirectly with " unprincipled cowards".
Now you are insulting me without cause when I am openly willing to hear your argument!!
I am calling you out!
Present your case against Hegseth or STFU counselor
Are you Chicken?
-
Dazzler whataboutism is the best whataboutism.
He's guilty. He stole secret stuff and gave it to people. Who did he give it to is my question.
-
“This chat reportedly had information about the timing of airstrikes, and included Hegseth's brother, his wife and about a dozen other people.”
I don’t have subpoena power, madam. It won’t be investigated and it’ll be swept under the rug. Pete loves Daddy. That’s what matters.
-
#1, you can't follow instructions.
#2 is that your evidence ?
" This chat reportedly had information"
What chat had information?
#3 NO heresay, media reports or articles are allowed as evidence...see #1
-
Mildred can't read example #5,233.
If you can't refute the point reframe their argument to one you can.
Tik tok, the trains are loading.
-
The Dazzler cheered and voted for this.
Treason!
-
“At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain,” said the White House.
-
“Trump hating media”, of course.
-
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/04/20/pentagon-chaos-ullyot-hegseth-00205594
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/03/hegseth-rules-inspector-generals-00593901
Vanilla is AIDS. -
No, you’re just technologically illiterate.
-
I didn’t realize H was going all the way back to the Signal nothingburger.
What a buffoon. “Lawyer” my ass.
-
H, you opened this can of worms using " media report"
Lots of inflammatory adjectives and allegations but they use leading words like inadvertently and likely..
How did that reporter get inadvertently added to the chat?
Were the other individuals authorized to be in the chat ( wife, brother, lawyer) or were they also added inadvertently?
From a Fox interview of Hegseth…(since you opened the can)
If you remember… I said no one is texting war plans. I said that because I'm in the bowels of the Pentagon every single day… what was shared over Signal then [during the first leak] and now was informal, unclassified coordinations for media coordination [and] other things,"
"At the beginning, it was left-wing reporters at The Atlantic who got hold of it and then wanted to create a problem for the president," he continued.
Again you do not follow instructions, start a thread. Don't hijack this one
I'll consider what you present objectively but if you are going to use opposition hit pieces that are missing crucial details and want the reader to fill in the blanks, I will have to consider articles and Hegseths own words that also debunk or cast doubt on what you present.
-
If H starts a thread, I'll need a defense volunteer to represent Hegseth
-
What aboutism is all the Dazzler has left. Now go Slo Joe stealing and storing docs in his garage and house where Hunters Russian and Chinese folks had access. Dont't forget the Chinese owning the college facility Biden stored stuff and had access.
I'll wait.
-
The Special Prosecutor said Slow Joe was too feeble-minded to be indicted. I don’t recall H even once wanting the 25th Amendment invoked during Rip Van Stinkle’s 4 disastrous years.
-
There has been silence from H
He chose this venue to bring his allegations against Hegseth and called us unprincipled cowards.
I thought he may have something more than what is readily available to the public at large
I was willing to honestly and objectively look at what he had .
I have no opinion of Hegseths guilt or innocence as I haven't seen any hard evidence to convince me one way or the other. I saw the initial reports and the media frenzy when the " leak" came out a long with "witnesses" and their opinions on the events and actions.
The usual suspects from the media took their sides to spin their version without answering key questions.
Hegseth came out publicly and denied the allegations.
That is where we are.
We don't have the full picture except in H's case.
He called us unprincipled cowards,
H has convicted Pete Hegseth in his mind with incomplete information at best, and is now avoiding this thread or starting a new one as requested, after being called to prove his case.
It's ok if H has an opinion of Hegseth and what happened with the Signal chat but until more facts come out that is all he has…an opinion…. and he should be careful making public allegations without having the facts or the balls to back up his claims.
I am done with this matter as of now and only engaged him because he called me/us unprincipled cowards.
I leave you with this question , who is the unprincipled coward?
Good day!
-5 @HHusky
