I don’t disagree but it is worth noting that the final four are traditional college football powers, blue bloods. They have the money to compete as well as the cachet to sell to players. Things may not change that much.
Some day a #12 seed is going to knock off a #1. That's going to be different. It's been all about 1 or 2 obviously dominant teams for so long that fans have forgotten the days where post season games, not involving said teams, still matter.
I actually like that prospect. I predicted that the 12 team field would eventually just mean more quality, meaningful games for more quality teams. I think that's where it's heading. It's a big improvement over what the bowls had become. At least the best players won't be opting out (until at least well into the first half).
That's such an absurd statement. Under Petermen a 14 point deficit is unlikely but last year with a half dozen NFL players on the offense and the quick strike ability all things were possible
Agree to disagree. UW left big plays on the table that would have gone for scores (Rome wide open and Penix misses him and Nixon dropping a wheel route that probably scores).
Of course we can agree to disagree. But let's take your key sentence and trade out the names and then see what that sounds like.
"We? left big plays on the table that would have gone for scores (Tay Martin wide open and Minshew misses him and Patmon dropping a wheel route that probably scores)"
Comments
You are right, embarrassing would have been a better word for me to have used.
I don’t disagree but it is worth noting that the final four are traditional college football powers, blue bloods. They have the money to compete as well as the cachet to sell to players. Things may not change that much.
Franklin in the Final Four
We? played Michigan close to even for three quarters IIRC, and then they pulled away.
F moral victories, but I have no doubt that it would have been closer had DeBeer not been in negotiations with the evil SEC.
You knew the _uck game was over y the second quarter.
Michigan had a big lead early
Losers rank losses
Some day a #12 seed is going to knock off a #1. That's going to be different. It's been all about 1 or 2 obviously dominant teams for so long that fans have forgotten the days where post season games, not involving said teams, still matter.
I actually like that prospect. I predicted that the 12 team field would eventually just mean more quality, meaningful games for more quality teams. I think that's where it's heading. It's a big improvement over what the bowls had become. At least the best players won't be opting out (until at least well into the first half).
WARSHINGTON got their ass kicked, but people forget it was a 13-20 game with UW driving in the middle of the 4th quarter
Penix to Odunze for 50 yards, DOOG IT UP!
iffy holding on Rosengarten, ball game.
As opposed to Oregon who got beat with a tire iron the entire first half before rallying to make it a respectable 3 score loss.
UW down 7 in the 3rd/4th with the ball multiple times.
That 3rd down drop by our backup RB...
you’re right 17-3 and 34-0 are the same thing.
We were never, ever going to win that game.
Did I say they were?
Due to the wefs and Dylan Johnson getting injured on the last fucking offensive play
That's such an absurd statement. Under Petermen a 14 point deficit is unlikely but last year with a half dozen NFL players on the offense and the quick strike ability all things were possible
Agree to disagree. UW left big plays on the table that would have gone for scores (Rome wide open and Penix misses him and Nixon dropping a wheel route that probably scores).
As bad as the first half was I texted iDawg and said we have them where we want them
Alas Michigan was no ASU or WSU
They FINISHED
@BleachedAnusDawg
Of course we can agree to disagree. But let's take your key sentence and trade out the names and then see what that sounds like.
"We? left big plays on the table that would have gone for scores (Tay Martin wide open and Minshew misses him and Patmon dropping a wheel route that probably scores)"
@Canadawg
Petersen would never go down 14 to Michigan. He'd keep it within 10 the whole natty and lose in the end by 10, maybe 9.
Huh?