I'm questioning why an educated American wouldn't demand identification. Tough to hold people accountable if you don't know who they are. You are the one telling us he shouldn't have done that and just cooperated with the nice men. It's almost like you aren't a real attorney.
So in your eyes, anyone who asserts their "legal right" and doesn't automatically bow to someone who shows up at their home unannounced and refuses to provide credentials is a piece of shit?
Oh the real agents still came. This guy cried to his mommy during the real encounter. That's just not on film. He made this video before or after the real encounter. Hard to say.
And yet your first reaction was that they were FBI and he was a shit for not cooperating by asking them for ID. That's some malarkey alright but as you like to say, "Woosh".
Comments
Triggered.
Fascists don't like rights shitposts of the day.
Possible. I'm old enough to remember the Joey Salads videos.
Film of the interview or it didn't happen.
This guy still believes the Pee-Pee dossier but not a perfectly normal neighbor hiring interview with me (wife wasn’t home) at my dining room table.
“Retarded” is the only word that come to mind.
I'm questioning why an educated American wouldn't demand identification. Tough to hold people accountable if you don't know who they are. You are the one telling us he shouldn't have done that and just cooperated with the nice men. It's almost like you aren't a real attorney.
If it’s staged, of course they wouldn’t show ID. I said if they’re really agents, why wouldn’t they show their badges.
Readers are Leaders, Ern.
So, you didn't film it. What a pussy.
He was offered id. But they didn't want to be filmed. You supposedly watched it, right?
Are you back to saying they really were FBI agents?
@HHusky vanillaaids again grrr!
So in your eyes, anyone who asserts their "legal right" and doesn't automatically bow to someone who shows up at their home unannounced and refuses to provide credentials is a piece of shit?
Im glad you have clarified your position
Your question is irrelevant to me. I don't care.
They're not agents.
I think the post being investigated shows him to be a piece of shit. You're free to disagree.
It was more important for him to be hero/victim to girls like yourself than to get identification.
He didn't have to stop filming, and they didn't have to proceed. Everyone made their choices.
But Gasbag posted this to make nonexistent claims of First Amendment infringement. Just stupid.
How much is the chance you are being played everytime you watch the evening news?
.
Oh the real agents still came. This guy cried to his mommy during the real encounter. That's just not on film. He made this video before or after the real encounter. Hard to say.
Keep dancing!
If they in fact were investigating something serious they would have provided credentials.
Or, they were there to intimidate in which they know they don't want to be caught on film violating the mans rights!
Whether the guy is a POS is irrelevant.
First amendment infringement is not stupid!
No First Amendment infringement whatsoever took place. That's the real takeaway.
No the takeaway is two guys tried some shenanigans and got called on it and got busted.
Shenanigans?
That's a lot of malarkey.
And yet your first reaction was that they were FBI and he was a shit for not cooperating by asking them for ID. That's some malarkey alright but as you like to say, "Woosh".
So they're fake but H was saying they were real and didn't have to show ID
Maybe you gals should get your story straight
I think he's a piece of shit for not talking to them and not turning off his camera too. He could have seen their ID.
Of course, this is all on the assumption that a nutjob like Kauffman didn't just stage the whole thing, like Ern suggested.
He is nuts and a piece of shit.
https://nhjournal.com/kauffman-ousted-in-free-state-shakeup/
Suck that FBI dick