Team Dazzler's FBI
Comments
-
Why did he need to prove it? If he is with the FBI, he identified himself as such. If he was lying, he's not a federal agent at all.
Logic ain't any strong suit for you gals.
-
"Law enforcement is constitutionally bound to cooperate with US citizens"
Couldn't quote you because vanilla aids but I award you +100 for this poast!
-
Im with the FBI ... I just told you, do you believe me?
-
I pity your clients
-
Is impersonating a federal agent a crime?
-
So he wasn't with the FBI? Okay. Then how is this an example of a federal agent not identifying himself as such?
-
You didn't think before you wrote this did you?
-
obviously duck isn't just a noun
run away!
-
Im with the FBI, you can't question that
-
You've opened my eyes. He wasn't actually visited by the FBI. So, was he in on the hoax?
-
Can you prove they were the FBI?
They could have ...but they didn't...
Now why would someone claim they were FBI agents and not be willing to show their badge when officially asked.
🤔
I can think of of couple reasons
Also, why didn't you respond to me yesterday?
I can think of a couple reasons
-
Then do it, please. In what scenario is somebody claiming to be law enforcement not obligated to prove that they are, in fact, law enforced? This isn’t an undercover situation.
Let’s see your game, @CallMeBigErn.
-
I don't know they were FBI. If they lied about it, then the comment that they were federal agent refusing to identify themselves as such is false. If they were telling the truth, then the comment that they refused to identify themselves as federal agents is false.
Kauffman doesn't question that they are with the FBI and certainly wants you to understand that they are.
If the video wasn't a scripted event, then Kauffman was offered the identification if he would stop filming. He wouldn't stop filming and the purported FBI agents decided not to proceed. Straightforward negotiation. A deal could not be reached. No harm done . . . to anyone . . . or to anyone's rights. A big fucking nothingburger.
-
Pitiful HH mythical client: HH, it's me Pitiful. I've got two dudes at my door telling me they are FBI agents and asking me if they can come in and just ask me some questions.
Mythical attorney HH: Well, since they have identified themselves as FBI agents I'm sure they are from the government and just want to help. As your mythical attorney my advice is to invite them in and tell them anything they want to know and if you have committed a crime, please tell them since you are a great patriotic American and they are just doing their duty to discover if you have done anything to break the law. I will send you my bill post haste.
-
Then you are onboard with the FBI finding out the identity of these two poseurs since they are impersonating federal agents, right?
Today is why @HHusky rarely engages. An Asskicking up and down the board and spiking the ball on 25% inflation (and that’s generous considering the indicators not used to measure) during his team’s administration.
@CallMeBigErn, do please tell us why it’s OK for these federal agents, if they are really FBI, to not prove this by showing their credentials.
Neighbor kids years ago that went to Stanford law was being hired by the FBI. An agent came to my house, identified himself, and briefly interviewed me about what I knew of the kid. Seems like that should be protocol.
-
What goalposts? You weren't questioning whether they were really with the FBI, Gasbag.
-
Film of the interview or it didn't happen.
I'm completely onboard with finding out who these impersonators are.
-
You can't seem to take Yes for an answer.
He is a piece of shit, but totally within his rights. Not the first time I've said that today.
-
It's not hard to solve this riddle. Everything makes sense if you consider that its probably staged. They didn't want to impersonate officers, obviously, hence no badge, no name, and boom, there's some nice MAGA footage to go viral with.
Hard to trust a guy who says murdering Kamala would make someone a hero. I give it a 60% chance that y'all have been played, maybe more.
-
Triggered.
Fascists don't like rights shitposts of the day.
-
Possible. I'm old enough to remember the Joey Salads videos.
-
Film of the interview or it didn't happen.
This guy still believes the Pee-Pee dossier but not a perfectly normal neighbor hiring interview with me (wife wasn’t home) at my dining room table.
“Retarded” is the only word that come to mind.
-
I'm questioning why an educated American wouldn't demand identification. Tough to hold people accountable if you don't know who they are. You are the one telling us he shouldn't have done that and just cooperated with the nice men. It's almost like you aren't a real attorney.
-
If it’s staged, of course they wouldn’t show ID. I said if they’re really agents, why wouldn’t they show their badges.
Readers are Leaders, Ern.
-
So, you didn't film it. What a pussy.
-
He was offered id. But they didn't want to be filmed. You supposedly watched it, right?
Are you back to saying they really were FBI agents?
-
@HHusky vanillaaids again grrr!
So in your eyes, anyone who asserts their "legal right" and doesn't automatically bow to someone who shows up at their home unannounced and refuses to provide credentials is a piece of shit?
Im glad you have clarified your position
-
Your question is irrelevant to me. I don't care.
They're not agents.
-
I think the post being investigated shows him to be a piece of shit. You're free to disagree.
It was more important for him to be hero/victim to girls like yourself than to get identification.
He didn't have to stop filming, and they didn't have to proceed. Everyone made their choices.
But Gasbag posted this to make nonexistent claims of First Amendment infringement. Just stupid.
