Yeah, I remember Jerry Falwell who was so fundamental that he supported Reagan who was a divorcee. Same Reagan that you tell us that you voted twice for. How did we survive. The only fundamentalists we need to be scared of are radical muslims and the the true believing commie green gaia religionists running the dem party.
But can you point to me on a map the countries that are based on a fundamentalist view of religion? Any religion? Tell me where on the globe there is some entire country, with borders and shit, that is based on some zealous fundamentalist sect of Christianity or Judiasm. Where its most radical tenets are baked into the law and where extremism dominates the culture? Here, the Branch Davidians are freaks. In the Middle East, their normal. Tell me I'm wrong.
Why can't you admit that there are countries founded on Islam, run their societies based on Islamic tenets, that want to keep everything as it was 700 fucking years ago? And why can't you admit that those countries are exporting their crazy to western countries who had figured out long ago a much better (western) way to live?
I just can't for the life of me understand the marriage between US left-wing liberals and followers and fans of Islam, what with all the crazy fucking biases and beliefs in the latter that clash most explicitly with those that have, heretofore, been the bedrock of western liberalism. Things like, for example, individual rights (women, gay people, etc.), freedom of expression, etc. I can remember when it was the dirty hippies at Berkeley who were yelling "free speech"; now your team is walking arm in arm with a group of people who think it's ok to resort to violence in response to being offended. Je fucking suis, Charlie.
I'm not a fan of any of the world's various, and all equally preposterous religions. I do know that most people aren't religious zealots however, and that the vast majority of Muslims arriving on our shores are leaving the places they come from for a reason and don't want those places replicated here.
You're seriously comparing multiple lawyer-client relationships of months and years duration to you meeting a waiter, all while simultaneously calling me dishonest.
I'll retire to Bedlam. (Second Charles Dickens reference today. Don't make me pull out a third.)
I know you think your short sentence responses are clever, but they're not IMO.
Your inability to discuss anything above-board without resorting to your anecdata, your inability to understand why it was a shitty sample, and your failure to appreciate that a person can have a discussion about a concerning trend without implicating the entire subject population, are individually astounding.
Like, everybody knows the statistics for violence among AA men aged 18-34 are not rosy. But, I have these black male clients, so those statistics can't be true. That was essentially your fucking response. You either did it to be a dick head, or you're stupid. I'll let you pick.
Put it this way. When BigErn or Buck are on your side, you should re-evaluate.
I think the lawyer who equated a fleeting encounter with a waiter one evening with ongoing client relationships might be feeling a little embarrassed. That would be justified. Or perhaps his employers don't let him anywhere near the actual clients. I'll let you pick.
Comments
I'll suggest you don't know what you're talking about.
My client list over the years has always included a fair number of Muslims. They're almost human.
Fuck off.... the fundamentalist Muslim is fucking dangerous period.
The fundamentalist ANYTHING is fucking dangerous.
Yeah, I remember Jerry Falwell who was so fundamental that he supported Reagan who was a divorcee. Same Reagan that you tell us that you voted twice for. How did we survive. The only fundamentalists we need to be scared of are radical muslims and the the true believing commie green gaia religionists running the dem party.
Ok.
But can you point to me on a map the countries that are based on a fundamentalist view of religion? Any religion? Tell me where on the globe there is some entire country, with borders and shit, that is based on some zealous fundamentalist sect of Christianity or Judiasm. Where its most radical tenets are baked into the law and where extremism dominates the culture? Here, the Branch Davidians are freaks. In the Middle East, their normal. Tell me I'm wrong.
Why can't you admit that there are countries founded on Islam, run their societies based on Islamic tenets, that want to keep everything as it was 700 fucking years ago? And why can't you admit that those countries are exporting their crazy to western countries who had figured out long ago a much better (western) way to live?
I just can't for the life of me understand the marriage between US left-wing liberals and followers and fans of Islam, what with all the crazy fucking biases and beliefs in the latter that clash most explicitly with those that have, heretofore, been the bedrock of western liberalism. Things like, for example, individual rights (women, gay people, etc.), freedom of expression, etc. I can remember when it was the dirty hippies at Berkeley who were yelling "free speech"; now your team is walking arm in arm with a group of people who think it's ok to resort to violence in response to being offended. Je fucking suis, Charlie.
Honestly, you really are not an honest debater. I'm starting to see the problem. It took me a while.
But please tell me more about your client list, and I'll tell you about the time I ate at a Pakistani restaurant and the waiter seemed totally fine.
We're lucky there are no dangerous Christians, I guess.
I'm not a fan of any of the world's various, and all equally preposterous religions. I do know that most people aren't religious zealots however, and that the vast majority of Muslims arriving on our shores are leaving the places they come from for a reason and don't want those places replicated here.
I'm not a fan of any of the world's various, and all equally preposterous religions
You’re a huge fan of the secularist religions such as Statism and Fascism, Debra. Never stop lying. It’s so you.
You're seriously comparing multiple lawyer-client relationships of months and years duration to you meeting a waiter, all while simultaneously calling me dishonest.
I'll retire to Bedlam. (Second Charles Dickens reference today. Don't make me pull out a third.)
Linking arms with extremist zealots sounds awful. Who would do such a thing?
JFC.
Cleverer than expected. Good job!
Yep. It's just like Afghanistan around here.
JFC.
Dumb.
You mean there are a lot of waiters?
I know you think your short sentence responses are clever, but they're not IMO.
Your inability to discuss anything above-board without resorting to your anecdata, your inability to understand why it was a shitty sample, and your failure to appreciate that a person can have a discussion about a concerning trend without implicating the entire subject population, are individually astounding.
Like, everybody knows the statistics for violence among AA men aged 18-34 are not rosy. But, I have these black male clients, so those statistics can't be true. That was essentially your fucking response. You either did it to be a dick head, or you're stupid. I'll let you pick.
Put it this way. When BigErn or Buck are on your side, you should re-evaluate.
I think the lawyer who equated a fleeting encounter with a waiter one evening with ongoing client relationships might be feeling a little embarrassed. That would be justified. Or perhaps his employers don't let him anywhere near the actual clients. I'll let you pick.
Didn't mean to interrupt the Islamophobic culture war. Carry on.
That LGNTQRSTWAXY+_++%$#@ flag you fly at your place say otherwise.