Vice President Kamala Harris suggesting Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, is only loyal to Donald Trump and not the U.S. had the GOP vice presidential nominee firing back in a potential tone-setting campaign moment Saturday night.
"I'd like to ask the vice president what has she done to question my loyalty to this country," a passionate Vance said, wrapping up his St. Cloud, Minnesota, campaign rally speech.
"I served in the United States Marine Corps. I went to Iraq for this country. I built a business for this country. And my running mate took a bullet for this country.
"So my question to Kamala Harris is, Wat the hell have you done to question our loyalty to the United States of America?"
Vance answered: "Nothing."
Vance's remarks were seizing on Harris' quick response video posted to social media after Vance was named Trump's running mate.
"Make no mistake: J.D. Vance will be loyal only to Trump, not to our country," said Harris, who was still not yet the presumptive Democrat nominee because President Joe Biden had not yet withdrawn from the race.
Kamala is going to have the triggered white woman vote irrespective of how Trump runs his campaign because it’s harder to attach her to inflation at the grocery store than it is the border or the war in Ukraine so there’s no reason to keep the gloves on.
Discussing the implementation of Green Emergy” is too “in the weeds” for him and he refuses to answer this question so he just ignores it. He’s a lightweight just like the other Tug Leftists.
How does Democrat politicians and judges removing Trump from state ballots “Defend Democracy?”
They are planning a total takeover by using those they have illegally imported, which is treason, and ending America. Prep gents! You commies don't worry the government will provide.
Love that nobody besides @Goduckies bothered to answer my question, followed by throwing out insults and then say I'm the one attacking the bored. I wasn't even forming an argument, I was posing a question. Not trying to bait. If I wanted to ragebait like Mello or HH I would just do it. It's easy to troll. Tougher to actually have a discussion.
I think it's pretty clear that this bored and others who think like it refuse to accept any result of the election that doesn't have Trump winning. So why even hold the election then? "My guy will win, but if he doesn't, it must be cheating. Must be all the illegals. Must be the voting machines. Must be the mail in ballots." This is the process we have. Both sides will accuse the other of foul play. It's going to happen right away. But if we're heading down a path where the losing side refuses to accept any situation where they lose, it's a dangerous way to go.
Keep in mind, and I'll say it again to stem the "you're just a leftard commie" flood: I think Kamala's a shit candidate. I don't expect her to win. She's only slightly more likeable than Hillary and that's still a low bar. She wouldn't be my 1st choice or even my 100th. But that's where it is. There are plenty of reasons to dislike her and Democrat policy. I disagree with a lot of it. I also disagree with the far right and Christian nationalism because I think it's both unconstitutional as it pertains to separating church and state, and moves our country backwards. Regardless, Kamala could still win. That's the subject of this thread. So what happens if she does?
That's every election ever and you know that. Two people run, some vote because they like the candidates, others vote just because there's no option otherwise being that third party candidates are useless. Giant Douche vs. Turd Sandwich. What's your point?
Still waiting on a reply to my question. If Trump wins you'll have no problem accepting the result as completely legit I'm sure. If Kamala does, it's rigged, the illegals did it, it's widespread voter fraud, etc. Make up your mind. Either the system works or it doesn't.
Comments
It's not an echo chamber, we don't all agree on everything. But it's clear the democrats have their talking points down.
People that can't form am argument attack the forum
Water is wet
Vice President Kamala Harris suggesting Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, is only loyal to Donald Trump and not the U.S. had the GOP vice presidential nominee firing back in a potential tone-setting campaign moment Saturday night.
"I'd like to ask the vice president what has she done to question my loyalty to this country," a passionate Vance said, wrapping up his St. Cloud, Minnesota, campaign rally speech.
"I served in the United States Marine Corps. I went to Iraq for this country. I built a business for this country. And my running mate took a bullet for this country.
"So my question to Kamala Harris is, Wat the hell have you done to question our loyalty to the United States of America?"
Vance answered: "Nothing."
Vance's remarks were seizing on Harris' quick response video posted to social media after Vance was named Trump's running mate.
"Make no mistake: J.D. Vance will be loyal only to Trump, not to our country," said Harris, who was still not yet the presumptive Democrat nominee because President Joe Biden had not yet withdrawn from the race.
Kamala is going to have the triggered white woman vote irrespective of how Trump runs his campaign because it’s harder to attach her to inflation at the grocery store than it is the border or the war in Ukraine so there’s no reason to keep the gloves on.
Ern doesn’t support shit.
Discussing the implementation of Green Emergy” is too “in the weeds” for him and he refuses to answer this question so he just ignores it. He’s a lightweight just like the other Tug Leftists.
How does Democrat politicians and judges removing Trump from state ballots “Defend Democracy?”
The tell is that you leftards have the same enthusiasm for a secure border that you do for honest elections.
One of the more frequent Gasbag Platitudes.
#GreatestHits
They are planning a total takeover by using those they have illegally imported, which is treason, and ending America. Prep gents! You commies don't worry the government will provide.
If a platitude is true, then if you are a leftard you just label it as a platitude.
Kind of a big IF, Gasbag, but not one you're going to let stop you from spewing ignorance about elections
Just another totally not nuts take from Mall Cop.
Loving that n
Love that nobody besides @Goduckies bothered to answer my question, followed by throwing out insults and then say I'm the one attacking the bored. I wasn't even forming an argument, I was posing a question. Not trying to bait. If I wanted to ragebait like Mello or HH I would just do it. It's easy to troll. Tougher to actually have a discussion.
I think it's pretty clear that this bored and others who think like it refuse to accept any result of the election that doesn't have Trump winning. So why even hold the election then? "My guy will win, but if he doesn't, it must be cheating. Must be all the illegals. Must be the voting machines. Must be the mail in ballots." This is the process we have. Both sides will accuse the other of foul play. It's going to happen right away. But if we're heading down a path where the losing side refuses to accept any situation where they lose, it's a dangerous way to go.
Keep in mind, and I'll say it again to stem the "you're just a leftard commie" flood: I think Kamala's a shit candidate. I don't expect her to win. She's only slightly more likeable than Hillary and that's still a low bar. She wouldn't be my 1st choice or even my 100th. But that's where it is. There are plenty of reasons to dislike her and Democrat policy. I disagree with a lot of it. I also disagree with the far right and Christian nationalism because I think it's both unconstitutional as it pertains to separating church and state, and moves our country backwards. Regardless, Kamala could still win. That's the subject of this thread. So what happens if she does?
We get it. You're voting for Harris
I'd be embarrassed too
Apparently you have no reason for doing so other than because
That's every election ever and you know that. Two people run, some vote because they like the candidates, others vote just because there's no option otherwise being that third party candidates are useless. Giant Douche vs. Turd Sandwich. What's your point?
Still waiting on a reply to my question. If Trump wins you'll have no problem accepting the result as completely legit I'm sure. If Kamala does, it's rigged, the illegals did it, it's widespread voter fraud, etc. Make up your mind. Either the system works or it doesn't.
If it's legit it's legit. If it isn't it isn't
When Trump wins the left will riot and democrats will claim Russia stole it
Just like 2016
What's your point?