Supreme Court allows for disinformation to be removed from Social Media
Comments
-
Wanna know how its disinformation? Because we have idiots like Sledog that repeat what they hear on Twitter and when I ask follow up questions, he has no clue about the subject. Which leads me to believe he and Race can't form their own opinions, theyre reliant on other people to tell them what to think!!
-
The “Legal Expenses” Clown Show wasn’t in federal court, Einstein. The DOJ and FEC found nothing to prosecute at the federal level.
So, the Biden DOJ sent in Micheal Colangelo to piece together a case to avoid the statute of limitation for a state crime by making up a federal conviction that never happened in the real world.
Why are you here, Dumbshit?
-
You calling someone an idiot is rich
You have yet to refute anything I've posted
Attacking the source is a white flag
It's proven that we were right and government boot lickers like you were wrong
Slither away boy
-
Care to refute this bucky?
-
But the plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves [self-censorship] based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."
Translation: Amy says we can't hand you an injunction just because you're a Right Wing fraidy cat.
-
No no no, i'll go straight to the Twitter/X source directly and dispute THEIR opinions. Why go through a middleman like yourself who isn't doing the thinking.
-
Government threatens you and you can't claim harm
Things fascists say
-
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.
I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
-
When you're a big pussy, everything looks like a threat.
-
If you don't look for harm you won't find it. Trump was harmed by the censorship and lies coordinated by Blinken about Hunter's laptop. Not hard to find someone harmed by their doctor's refusal to prescribe ivermectin based on Fow Chee, the CDC and FDA lying about it and getting social media to censor "disinformation". The leftard position is accordingly that the government can threaten media platforms if they don't suppress free speech, which they did, and there is no remedy available. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
-
That misses the point completely
Good job
The same people that said Biden wouldn't cause inflation that he in fact did cause say Trump’s mythical future policies will cause inflation
worst inflation since Carter under Biden
Try again
-
Things fascists say
Once again my argument is untouched
Another white flag
-
I mean….his policies didn't. The inflation is coming from the 10-15 year span of free money finally catching up to everyone.
Trump wants to be able to set those interest rates himself. THAT will cause inflation again, but outside his term since he doesn't care about long term effects.
Oh man, I cant wait to see what Twitter/X replies with.
-
What did they say about WAPO, NYT, nbc, cbs, cnn, abc, la times, msnbc, etc. etc?
-
Bucky blaming Trump
Yawn
I guess the experts know their audience
Morons
-
Yet when they looked . . .
The Supreme Court opinion states that none of the states and individuals who brought the suit could connect government communications about social media posts to actions taken against them.
Barrett wrote that the plaintiffs could not make a connection between government communication and moderation decisions, treated “the government” as a monolithic entity and frequently confused the timeline.
“But they fail, by and large, to link their past social-media restrictions to the defendants’ communications with the platforms,” Barrett wrote.
The plaintiffs tried to use as evidence government communications with social media companies that happened after blocking decisions against them, or government communications with a different social media company, Barrett wrote.
"But the gubment!", screeched the plaintiffs, Gasbag, and the other girls.
-
Did your Brownshirt get extra starch today?
. -
Wheres my money?
-
The government is only doing a little censorship
-
I don't answer dumb fucks. You are a gargantuan dumb fuck.
-
Just the tip.
-
Where’s the proof?
. -
-
-
Antifa maaaaannnn
-
Advanced topics like the Fed setting mortgage rates?
