r/politics, r/news, and DemocraticUnderground.com are my guesses along with some biased Climate.Org website. None of them allow any questioning of Leftist dogma.
Authoritarian governments in major countries, including our own, are now are going after Elon Musk and Twitter for allowing dissent and criticism of their regimes.
If I posted scientific research, A. You wouldn't understand it and B. You'd attack it. I'm not falling for your bait. I've posted plenty of sources in my short history in this cesspool. Go find em.
Remember, you guys are the ones who need to prove that the Earth is flat, cigarettes are not bad for you, and human caused climate change isn't real. I'm on the side of the universally accepted truths. Y'all are the ones who think every damn thing in the world is a conspiracy despite evidence to the contrary. Remember that.
Bot literally said he would accept your science and what is your solution and cost benefit and actual ability of the green new steal to deliver. I asked you where the 50 cents a gallon Inslee is taking is going and how is it helping
Since you care, bachelors in geophysics, Masters in geological engineering, like I've said before. You need a picture of my degrees or what? Why do you care so much? You're soft as hell.
Big Ern I'm sure was a huge covid bro and Trump is a Putin stooge, inflation doesn't exist, uh is transitory, uh is good for the Sugar Bowl Ticket Index, but he has strong feelings that expensive dirty non-reliable renewable energy is good for the chicoms, uh American workers and consumers.
Hey Alzheimers, that was never the topic. You can keep screeching it, that's fine. I still haven't heard one person in here actually stand up and admit to the existence of human caused climate change at best, with flat out denials at worst. There isn't one reasonable human being with an interest in admitting truths or debating in any sort of adult manner. Conservative my fucking ass. I know and am friends with many a conservative. They hate your fucking guts. Ya'll are just a bunch of Russian/MAGA parrots executing the company line to a T. You guys are a joke and you make this university look fucking terrible.
An engineering degree! But let's not discuss engineering problems. To in the weeds.
Anyway, good, I'm glad you should understand that the scientific method includes rigorous good faith debate and generally as good practice a reliance on primary sources.
Comments
r/politics, r/news, and DemocraticUnderground.com are my guesses along with some biased Climate.Org website. None of them allow any questioning of Leftist dogma.
Authoritarian governments in major countries, including our own, are now are going after Elon Musk and Twitter for allowing dissent and criticism of their regimes.
[Citation Required] [error 404 Citation reference list not found]
If I posted scientific research, A. You wouldn't understand it and B. You'd attack it. I'm not falling for your bait. I've posted plenty of sources in my short history in this cesspool. Go find em.
Facebook.com
They probably all get their news from Facebook and meta approved links to legacy media would be my guess.
Remember, you guys are the ones who need to prove that the Earth is flat, cigarettes are not bad for you, and human caused climate change isn't real. I'm on the side of the universally accepted truths. Y'all are the ones who think every damn thing in the world is a conspiracy despite evidence to the contrary. Remember that.
Bot literally said he would accept your science and what is your solution and cost benefit and actual ability of the green new steal to deliver. I asked you where the 50 cents a gallon Inslee is taking is going and how is it helping
And that was a line too far for you
That is how HARD leftists roll I guess
Shane
Hi, I hold a bachelor's of science and am about to receive a masters.
What's your qualifications? I'm all ears.
Embarrassing straw man.
Ftr I was/am pretty middle of the road by 2016? Standards. Go check the poasts.
People like the Biden bros on here are fully displaying why I identify with the right at this point more than ever.
Remember, the constitution is a white supremacist document at this point.
He’s too intelligent for all of use with a B.S. who understand the scientific method.
“Trust me bro” seems to be his position.
Since you care, bachelors in geophysics, Masters in geological engineering, like I've said before. You need a picture of my degrees or what? Why do you care so much? You're soft as hell.
Big Ern I'm sure was a huge covid bro and Trump is a Putin stooge,
inflation doesn't exist, uh is transitory,uh is good for the Sugar Bowl Ticket Index, but he has strong feelings that expensive dirty non-reliable renewable energy is good forthe chicoms, uh American workers and consumers.I wonder when an attempt will be made on Tucker's life. Did you hear what he said about Mike Pompeo?
He's serious and his degree provides him with superhuman intelligence. Fuck off fatboy.
he's a serious scientist with a degree in geology. They called it rocks for jocks for a reason dumbass.
Human caused climate change - as it relates to earth temperature - is complete bullshit. Only a fucking lemming buys into the scam at this point.
The science:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cl6ynrNoSs8/?igsh=MWEweXFnMG5rdjN2Mg==
.
Wait - cigarettes are bad for you??!!
Hey Alzheimers, that was never the topic. You can keep screeching it, that's fine. I still haven't heard one person in here actually stand up and admit to the existence of human caused climate change at best, with flat out denials at worst. There isn't one reasonable human being with an interest in admitting truths or debating in any sort of adult manner. Conservative my fucking ass. I know and am friends with many a conservative. They hate your fucking guts. Ya'll are just a bunch of Russian/MAGA parrots executing the company line to a T. You guys are a joke and you make this university look fucking terrible.
MELTDOWN
An engineering degree! But let's not discuss engineering problems. To in the weeds.
Anyway, good, I'm glad you should understand that the scientific method includes rigorous good faith debate and generally as good practice a reliance on primary sources.
I look forward to your citations list.