Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
It only gets crazier and crazier
jecornel
Member Posts: 9,727
in Tug Tavern
Comments
E. Mean Carrol belief change the law to allowing suits from an incident this old to be filed…and a lefty billionaire paid for all of it including her attorney.
The E. Jean Carroll case is the most baffling of all five. She, the alleged victim, did not remember even the year in which the purported sexual assault took place, nearly three decades ago. Observers have pointed out dozens of inconsistencies in her story.
It was never clear what were the preliminaries that supposedly (Trump denies meeting her) led both, allegedly, willingly to retreat together to a department store dressing room, where during normal business hours the alleged violence took place.
Moreover, the sexual assault complaint came forward decades post facto—and only after Trump was running for and then president.
Lots of funds available to pay off jurors on an $83 million judgement.
10% for the big guy still leaves plenty for the 12 angry men/women/binary beings (why was it $83.3m? Because that’s the gross up for Cho Bai Den’s cut for a net $75 mill)
Trust no one.
Except the Throbber.
Indelible on the hippopotamus
Lots of funds were available prior since billionaire demonrat Reid Hoffman was paying all the legal bills and to help change state law so it could be filed.
Judge warns Carroll jurors to not identify themselves. Wouldn’t want anyone poking into their newly lavish purchases and lifestyles. Problem is, you give 9-12 Leftists $50-100,000, half are going to go into debt within a few years and want to get paid again.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/jean-carroll-donald-trump-trial-judge/674011/
I made the mistake of starting to read that Atlantic article. The delusions are real.
lol finally the grift paid off. I figured one of the 10,000 people that came out of the woodwork against trump looking for fame and a payout would end up getting something
Yeah, he didn't even know her.
Obviously not in the biblical sense given the lack of any evidence.
oh, obviously
Tara Reade had time and date while Sweet Ashley had a record in her journal of Daddy sexually assaulting both of them.
Why do you support a man whose own Daddy had to shower after he was asleep because she was so fearful of Joe molesting her yet again? Odd that you’d believe a crazy people see Carroll and that Kavanaugh accuser who looked like Wayne’s World Garth but not specific dates and a written record of Daddy Biden’s sexual assaults.
How come you struggle with the obviousness available to the mouth breathers among us?
What makes it so difficult for you?
'Cuz Tara Reade isn't nuts or a known liar.
obviously
so we ignore her but believe this woman?
http://www.twitter.com/rasmussen_poll/status/1751368693894828124?s=46&t=BrPpxiJ6HKnfDhc1-qw4vg
And the own goal
Weird how Daddy fought the DNA test which would have exonerated him.