It only gets crazier and crazier
Comments
-
E. Mean Carrol belief change the law to allowing suits from an incident this old to be filed…and a lefty billionaire paid for all of it including her attorney.
-
The E. Jean Carroll case is the most baffling of all five. She, the alleged victim, did not remember even the year in which the purported sexual assault took place, nearly three decades ago. Observers have pointed out dozens of inconsistencies in her story.
It was never clear what were the preliminaries that supposedly (Trump denies meeting her) led both, allegedly, willingly to retreat together to a department store dressing room, where during normal business hours the alleged violence took place.
Moreover, the sexual assault complaint came forward decades post facto—and only after Trump was running for and then president. -
Lots of funds available to pay off jurors on an $83 million judgement.
10% for the big guy still leaves plenty for the 12 angry men/women/binary beings (why was it $83.3m? Because that’s the gross up for Cho Bai Den’s cut for a net $75 mill)
Trust no one.
Except the Throbber.
-
Indelible on the hippopotamus
-
Lots of funds were available prior since billionaire demonrat Reid Hoffman was paying all the legal bills and to help change state law so it could be filed.
-
Judge warns Carroll jurors to not identify themselves. Wouldn’t want anyone poking into their newly lavish purchases and lifestyles. Problem is, you give 9-12 Leftists $50-100,000, half are going to go into debt within a few years and want to get paid again.
-
I made the mistake of starting to read that Atlantic article. The delusions are real.
-
-
lol finally the grift paid off. I figured one of the 10,000 people that came out of the woodwork against trump looking for fame and a payout would end up getting something
-
Yeah, he didn't even know her.
-
Obviously not in the biblical sense given the lack of any evidence.
-
oh, obviously
-
Tara Reade had time and date while Sweet Ashley had a record in her journal of Daddy sexually assaulting both of them.
Why do you support a man whose own Daddy had to shower after he was asleep because she was so fearful of Joe molesting her yet again? Odd that you’d believe a crazy people see Carroll and that Kavanaugh accuser who looked like Wayne’s World Garth but not specific dates and a written record of Daddy Biden’s sexual assaults.
-
How come you struggle with the obviousness available to the mouth breathers among us?
What makes it so difficult for you? -
-
'Cuz Tara Reade isn't nuts or a known liar.
obviously
-
so we ignore her but believe this woman?
-
-
And the own goal
-
Weird how Daddy fought the DNA test which would have exonerated him.
-
DNA from the dress she claimed she wrote but hasn't been manufactured yet? Another lie by her. But keep going ambulance boy.
-
Didn't remember what year and had zero proof, has accused about 6 other people of rape, is as crazy as a loon in about 1000 social media posts, obsessed with talking about sex, but here hh is defending her.
LOL! It is to be expected. Again, hh is laughable.
-
But Daddy never met her, so no way it was his DNA anyway. Right?
-
I’m old enough to remember you taking the side of a “rape victim” who had sworn under oath that she hadn’t been raped.
-
What DNA? From where? Wrong as always. Can't get any from a dress that didn't exist when the event occurred. Damn Perry Mason!
-
Trump offered his DNA for a test, you pathological liar and even bigger piece of shit.
-
@HHusky just lies and lies about everything.
-
@HHusky why did you lie?
Also, why are you so obsessed with the word “daddy”? -
Answer: Because of his lifetime NAMBLA membership.
-
Yeah he's not a political hack at all…
