Jobless Claims 187,000
Comments
-
Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!WestlinnDuck said:
No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.HuskyBuck said:
“What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.
I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?
Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.
In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.
-
Well at least you admit those jobs were here before and therefore disagree with your brain-dead party and President whom refer to them as "new jobs" they "created."HuskyBuck said:
Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!WestlinnDuck said:
No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.HuskyBuck said:
“What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.
I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?
Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.
In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.
Lurk a little longer and you might become smarter and more credible. -
I thought you didn't deal in hypothetical? Just FACTS.HuskyBuck said:
Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!WestlinnDuck said:
No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.HuskyBuck said:
“What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.
I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?
Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.
In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling. -
This regime is convinced that "the narrative" is all that matters and not objective reality.pawz said:
Indoctrination. Cable news, legacy media, education.TurdBomber said:
It's almost sad this must be pointed out. But the BidenBros are a stubbornly stupid bunch.UW_Doog_Bot said:@HuskyBuck doesn't remember any enforced lockdowns.
But yeah, shut down/destroy the economy and destroy millions of jobs(which haven't been recovered to-date) then claim "job creation!" when some of those jobs come back.
Hysterics about hypotheticals incoming.
“It’s easier to fool somebody than convince them they’ve been fooled.” -Nitzchke
Bidenbros are proof their concept has merit if all you care about is remaining in power.
It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank the Big Guy for reducing the unemployment rate to 7%. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the unemployment rate was to be REDUCED to 3.5%. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. -
I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%. I’m sorry you dont like the way its ALWAYS been calculated, even under Trump.
Answer me this. What was the real unemployment rate under Trump’s best month? 3.5? What do you think the real unemployment rate is right now? -
After the dems made them unemployed in the first place...and as long as you don't count the 6 million long term unemployed(which the BLS does as we already went over).HuskyBuck said:I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%
You just don't like facts I suppose.
Fucking hondofs. Even Susan had the good sense to abandon ship. Even Brandon abandoned this talking point. Bidenomics is DOA. Let it go. -
Obama changed the way unemployment was counted because it was so high. You only count if you are collecting. I recall in 2016 some of us saying that Trump should change it back since his economy wasn't going to suck. But it didn't happen
Government stats are worthless because they have been corrupted to fool the willingly stupid
We have a couple here -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
After the dems made them unemployed in the first place...and as long as you don't count the 6 million long term unemployed(which the BLS does as we already went over).HuskyBuck said:I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%
You just don't like facts I suppose.
Fucking hondofs. Even Susan had the good sense to abandon ship. Even Brandon abandoned this talking point. Bidenomics is DOA. Let it go.
So do you have the real unemployment number or what??? -
All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
-
I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
-
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
-
Why so angry?HuskyBuck said:
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
-
Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?HuskyBuck said:
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
-
That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!Sledog said:
Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?HuskyBuck said:
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL -
I normally do. But you don't read it or you would know better regarding the election that was stolen.HuskyBuck said:
That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!Sledog said:
Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?HuskyBuck said:
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL -
Yup still no proof. Lots of excuses though. LOTS of excuses. -
coming back, after mostly Dimocrats took them away over a coldHuskyBuck said:
Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!WestlinnDuck said:
No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.HuskyBuck said:
“What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.
I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?
Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.
In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.
-
Please tell me you're under 30HuskyBuck said:
That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!Sledog said:
Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?HuskyBuck said:
Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh hehSledog said:All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL -
Educate yourself on how unemployment figures are calculated and who they don't include, but should.HuskyBuck said:I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
https://www.cnet.com/personal-finance/low-unemployment-statistics-are-misleading-economic-hardship-is-much-worse/ -
And he wants people to think he's smart.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
coming back, after mostly Dimocrats took them away over a coldHuskyBuck said:
Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!WestlinnDuck said:
No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.HuskyBuck said:
“What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.
I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?
Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.
In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling. -
I’m sure the irony is lost on you.HuskyBuck said:
Yup still no proof. Lots of excuses though. LOTS of excuses.
-
We also went over that, BLS has it as almost 6 million long term unemployed...which makes about 7% total unemployment...like I guessed at at the beginning from the participation rate. Maybe take up your problems with the BLS. Do you know who that is?HuskyBuck said:UW_Doog_Bot said:
After the dems made them unemployed in the first place...and as long as you don't count the 6 million long term unemployed(which the BLS does as we already went over).HuskyBuck said:I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%
You just don't like facts I suppose.
Fucking hondofs. Even Susan had the good sense to abandon ship. Even Brandon abandoned this talking point. Bidenomics is DOA. Let it go.
So do you have the real unemployment number or what???
Are you actually learning disabled?
-
Lol 7am victory lap. Jfc.HuskyBuck said:I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
-
I’m just surprised you would make a claim then run away from explaining how you came to that conclusion. Well…not really.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Lol 7am victory lap. Jfc.HuskyBuck said:I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
-
Adhd confirmed. See above. I've answered the question and cited the BLS numerous times.HuskyBuck said:
I’m just surprised you would make a claim then run away from explaining how you came to that conclusion. Well…not really.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Lol 7am victory lap. Jfc.HuskyBuck said:I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
Kids that can't read good and stuff. -
Refresh my memory…if the current unemployment rate isn’t 3.5 as reported by the BLS….whats the exact number?
-
Following what been disclosed in this thread, probably 3.5 + 7.HuskyBuck said:Refresh my memory…if the current unemployment rate isn’t 3.5 as reported by the BLS….whats the exact number?
What’s that, 10.5%?
-
5.7 million long term unemployed(which aren't counted in your 3.5% number).UW_Doog_Bot said:
I did that math off the cuff in my head.UW_Doog_Bot said:
So about 3 million less participants in total. Which means true unemployment is actually somewhere around 7%.HuskyBuck said:
So is Labor Participation up since January 2021? According to that chart it looks like its trending upwards just like it was doing under Trump.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Same game as under Obama.WestlinnDuck said:Labor participation rate is still down since January 2020 and not trending well. Couldn't find a chart on the Sugar Bowl participation rate which is the gold standard of course for the status of the economy.
The unemployment rate is so low! If you don't count all the people who are long term unemployed.
Here's what Labor Participation rate did from when Trump was in office, to Janurary 2020 which was right before pandemic hit
Trump:
Jan 2017. - 62.8
Jan 2020 - 63.3
Biden:
Jan 2021 - 61.5
Now - 62.5
This is why I call you Oregon fans dumb as dirt. You can't intrepret a chart.
Something Something dumb as dirt.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjDj9jTzuyDAxUkMEQIHU8cDiMQFnoECDYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0El9HPDNwCkjhZ_HvoSxIU
Come get some.
Also, lulz, about that trend.
Fucking love it when tug smooth brains want to wrastle economics with me.
As opposed to 2019 there being 1.2 million...
https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2020/article/job-market-remains-tight-in-2019-as-the-unemployment-rate-falls-to-its-lowest-level-since-1969.htm
Do I need to explain this to you further? -
No,pawz said:
Following what been disclosed in this thread, probably 3.5 + 7.HuskyBuck said:Refresh my memory…if the current unemployment rate isn’t 3.5 as reported by the BLS….whats the exact number?
What’s that, 10.5%?
2023: 3.5% short term + 3.5% long term ~ 7% total
As opposed to
2019: 3.5% short term + 0.7% long term ~ 4.2% total
I'm rounding some significant numbers but doing this on my phone.
Happy to break it out more exactly from BLS when not at work.
