Michigan -4 over UW.
Comments
-
Grubb says DJ is expected to play. We're going to win. Possibly by 2-3 scores.
-
The staff likes to lie. IWTLTDhouseofpain247 said:Grubb says DJ is expected to play. We're going to win. Possibly by 2-3 scores.
-
Different game plan, you don't really have to worry about Michigan beating you over the top. Can sell out to stop the run.
-
Michigan blitzed almost every down against Alabama and their QB couldn't handle it. Penix will.RaceBannon said:
-
OSU was good when we? played them and it was windy and raining which played right into the Beavers' hands.PostGameOrangeSlices said:whlinder said:
Iâm not confident, definitely less confident than Texas. Harbaugh is better than Sark and Michigan also thinks they are a team of destiny with their self inflicted scandals. They are confident and tuff.PineapplePirate said:I wish I had the confidence that you all do.
The good news is Harbaugh has never won the last game. He had what, 4 downs from the 10 yard line to win a Super Bowl and didnât.
Deboner has won the last game. 3 times.
I am supremely confident.
Michigan has not played a "good" offense all year. Bama and Ohio State are rated in the 40s.
UW had to play Oregon x2, Texas, Arizona, USC...hell even WSU has a solid offense. -
Load the box and let it rip.backthepack said:Different game plan, you don't really have to worry about Michigan beating you over the top. Can sell out to stop the run.
If ASU can do it... -
100% this.backthepack said:Different game plan, you don't really have to worry about Michigan beating you over the top. Can sell out to stop the run.
Texas has good receivers and Jackson and Muhammad, Asa and Hampton, handled them with ease for the most part
Washington has faced two top 10 offenses 3 times (Oregon and Texas), top 20 USC, top 20 Arizona, and decent WSU and Beav squads
Michigan has faced busted Bama and OSU offenses and that's it.
The defense is going to sell out to stop Corum and McCarthy is not keeping up with Penix.
Pods, we are national champs. It is destined. -
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI -
Say 35-21.RoadTrip said:Easy $. UW $line and plus the 4. Michigan doesn't score 30, UW does.
-
But something dumb will happen and UW wins 35-34. I might finally be a happy fan if your prediction actually happens.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Say 35-21.RoadTrip said:Easy $. UW $line and plus the 4. Michigan doesn't score 30, UW does.
-
He's scored more touchdowns than both Oregon running backs combined.RoadTrip said:
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI -
He's the featured back in a run heavy offense. Oregon rotates theirs a lot.Southerndawg said:
He's scored more touchdowns than both Oregon running backs combined.RoadTrip said:
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI
Last year Cameron Davis had, I think, 13 touchdowns. He's not in the same league as any of the guys mentioned here -
is Bo Nix better than Penix because he has more touchdowns?Southerndawg said:
He's scored more touchdowns than both Oregon running backs combined.RoadTrip said:
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI -
But who would you rather have make lunch for your kids and fuck your wife?backthepack said:
is Bo Nix better than Penix because he has more touchdowns?Southerndawg said:
He's scored more touchdowns than both Oregon running backs combined.RoadTrip said:
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI -
Corum is pretty damn good.RoadTrip said:
No way the Michigan back is better than either of the 2 headed Oregon monsters.Southerndawg said:
True, but not really any more of a threat. Michigan is better on both lines, has a better running back, and a better defense in general. Beating them will be a bigger deal than beating Oregon, for a number of reasons.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Nix is a lot more versatile than McCarthySoutherndawg said:
Just my opinion, but I don't think they are, not this year.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oregon is better than MichiganSoutherndawg said:
Michigan has a much better pass rush than Texas, they're a better team than Texas. And I agree they're not Alabama 2016, just likely the best team the Huskies have faced since Alabama 2016. They're beatable, for sure, but make no mistake, this will be the biggest challenge of the year for the Huskies. The same can be said of Michigan though. They haven't faced an O-line, quarterback or wide receiving corps like UW's.Kingdome_Urinals said:
UW handled the shit out of Texas DLine. Smacked those fat bitches across the face for 3 hours. Michigan is not at their level.Southerndawg said:
To be fair, Alabama came together as the season progressed. They were playing very well at the end of the season. They beat an excellent Georgia team and almost beat an excellent Michigan team. Also, due to injury, opt-outs and portal entries, tOSU that played Mizzou was not the same as tOSU that played Michigan. tOSU that played Michigan would likely have smoked Mizzou. Kirby Smart was right to question the bowl system after Georgia's embarrassingly bad blowout win over FSU in the face of injuries, opt-outs and portal entries that gutted FSU.Sobchak_Security said:Alabama was a dumpy mess of a team that trailed this year in the 2nd half of 7(!) of its 14 games. It also had a tight end playing quarterback. Michigan could have easily lost to that dumpy Bama team even with Bamaâs center having the yips.
Michiganâs other marquee win dropped the stinker of the bowl season against Missouri.
Washington is better but this game will come down to whether Penix can be accurate with the football. Itâs not a foregone conclusion but I like our odds.
IMO Michigan will be the best team Washington has faced in years. Perhaps the best since Alabama in 2016. I agree with your take that matchups matter a lot. The key matchup IMO is their? D-line vs our? O-line. If we? win that battle, we? will control the pace of the game to our? advantage.
Fuck Michigan. They are not near Alabama's 2016 level. Corum, McCarthy, and Wilson are excellent college players but are B+ talent. Texas cooked UW with speed and Michigan has less of that.
They will be methodical, however. And UW sucks against the run.
People underrate how dominant UW is on the offensive side. Crazy talent.
EWIWBI -
Anyone remember when Lake was playing safeties 30 yards off the line against heavy run formations...backthepack said:Different game plan, you don't really have to worry about Michigan beating you over the top. Can sell out to stop the run.
God, what a good time.
Note... the safety instantly retreated 10 yards even further backwards off the snap for a run that went for 15... -
imagine destroying a blue blood (at the time) on the road who was ranked 9th in the country and not moving up one spot.Southerndawg said:
Not much plodding along in 1991. Mostly severe smashing. They left no doubt.RTD said:
Of course, different era, 91 was about defensive dominance and plodding to victory, if your team was lucky enough to have balance beyond a running game that was extra. 30 years later itâs about protecting the talent and the Dawgs have a super charged offense, thatâs puts more points up than their D gives up. Thatâs how this squad wins.Southerndawg said:
Completely different teams. Those differences instill different levels of confidence.RTD said:
The Dawgs have spent the better part of the last theee decades in the desert. Im guessing most of you were too young to remember 91. If you canât get up for this and ride the wave till the end youâre missing the moment.PineapplePirate said:I wish I had the confidence that you all do.
The 1991 DaWgs were Bad Motherfuckers. They featured one of the best college defenses ever and an outstanding balanced offense, the best college team of the decade in my opinion, and among the best of all time. They smashed opponents. I, and many many others, never doubted them.
The 2023 DaWgs feature a multi-generational QB, an outstanding group of wide receivers and an outstanding offensive line. DJ is an excellent running back, Iet's hope he's available for the NCG. The defense can play, in fact they are a bit underrated IMO, but they are not smashing anyone. I have doubted these DaWgs and I'm certain I'm not alone in here. They have been very close to Cougin' it in more than a few games, including the Apple Cup and nearly last night. They do find a way to win. Winners win and all that .... until they don't. IMO, their most impressive win this season was the CCG. They dominated a very good Oregon team, arguably the best team they have played so far this season, but again, the final score was closer than it should have been. It is that tendency to make wins harder than should be that has many doubting them and bettors betting against them.
(4) Washington @ Stanford PAC-10 W 42. 7
(4) Washington @. (9)Â Nebraska Big 8. W. 36 21
(4)Â Washington Kansas State Big 8. W 56 3
(3)Â Washington Arizona Pac-10. W. 54. 0
(3)Â Washington Toledo MAC W. 48. 0
(3)Â Washington @. (7)Â California Pac-10. W. 24. 17
(3)Â Washington Oregon Pac-10. W. 29. 7
(3)Â Washington Arizona State Pac-10. W. 44. 16
(2)Â Washington @. USC. Pac-10. W. 14. 3
(3)Â Washington @. Oregon State Pac-10. W. 58. 6
(2)Â Washington Wash State Pac-10. W. 56. 21
(2)Â Washington N. (4)Â Michigan Big Ten. W. 34. 14
in a season long popularity contest to decide a champion. What a system. -
Pretty sure the o/u is 55.5. Playing with house money at this point.RoadTrip said:
But something dumb will happen and UW wins 35-34. I might finally be a happy fan if your prediction actually happens.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Say 35-21.RoadTrip said:Easy $. UW $line and plus the 4. Michigan doesn't score 30, UW does.
-
Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð -
What the fuck is this shit.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð -
Seems like a parody of a Damone alt.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð -
BlueWeasel said:
Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð
Ok! Damone. -
BroadcastingDawg said:
What the fuck is this shit.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð
-
-
Generally agree with your comment. A "plus one" game, UW vs Miami that year would have been perfect. There was no doubt they were the two best teams. I do strongly believe UW would have beaten them, physically and on the score board, as happened in 1994, but of course that is entirely hypothetical.gmo said:
imagine destroying a blue blood (at the time) on the road who was ranked 9th in the country and not moving up one spot.Southerndawg said:
Not much plodding along in 1991. Mostly severe smashing. They left no doubt.RTD said:
Of course, different era, 91 was about defensive dominance and plodding to victory, if your team was lucky enough to have balance beyond a running game that was extra. 30 years later itâs about protecting the talent and the Dawgs have a super charged offense, thatâs puts more points up than their D gives up. Thatâs how this squad wins.Southerndawg said:
Completely different teams. Those differences instill different levels of confidence.RTD said:
The Dawgs have spent the better part of the last theee decades in the desert. Im guessing most of you were too young to remember 91. If you canât get up for this and ride the wave till the end youâre missing the moment.PineapplePirate said:I wish I had the confidence that you all do.
The 1991 DaWgs were Bad Motherfuckers. They featured one of the best college defenses ever and an outstanding balanced offense, the best college team of the decade in my opinion, and among the best of all time. They smashed opponents. I, and many many others, never doubted them.
The 2023 DaWgs feature a multi-generational QB, an outstanding group of wide receivers and an outstanding offensive line. DJ is an excellent running back, Iet's hope he's available for the NCG. The defense can play, in fact they are a bit underrated IMO, but they are not smashing anyone. I have doubted these DaWgs and I'm certain I'm not alone in here. They have been very close to Cougin' it in more than a few games, including the Apple Cup and nearly last night. They do find a way to win. Winners win and all that .... until they don't. IMO, their most impressive win this season was the CCG. They dominated a very good Oregon team, arguably the best team they have played so far this season, but again, the final score was closer than it should have been. It is that tendency to make wins harder than should be that has many doubting them and bettors betting against them.
(4) Washington @ Stanford PAC-10 W 42. 7
(4) Washington @. (9)Â Nebraska Big 8. W. 36 21
(4)Â Washington Kansas State Big 8. W 56 3
(3)Â Washington Arizona Pac-10. W. 54. 0
(3)Â Washington Toledo MAC W. 48. 0
(3)Â Washington @. (7)Â California Pac-10. W. 24. 17
(3)Â Washington Oregon Pac-10. W. 29. 7
(3)Â Washington Arizona State Pac-10. W. 44. 16
(2)Â Washington @. USC. Pac-10. W. 14. 3
(3)Â Washington @. Oregon State Pac-10. W. 58. 6
(2)Â Washington Wash State Pac-10. W. 56. 21
(2)Â Washington N. (4)Â Michigan Big Ten. W. 34. 14
in a season long popularity contest to decide a champion. What a system. -
Maybe if Michigan acquires UW's signs. Dude, the best offense Michigan faced all year ranks like 40th in the country. UW will score more than fucking 10 points against the Cheaterines. They'll sell out to stop the run much more than how they defended against Texas as well. I hope Michigan players/coaches are thinking it will be as much of a cakewalk as you do.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð -
Whether itâs Michigan or Stanford, under Pete/Kwat/Lake, we(?) insisted playing Harbaugh teams with only two true DL with their hands on the ground. We repeatedly got our shit pushed in irrespective of where the S stood.BroadcastingDawg said:
Anyone remember when Lake was playing safeties 30 yards off the line against heavy run formations...backthepack said:Different game plan, you don't really have to worry about Michigan beating you over the top. Can sell out to stop the run.
God, what a good time.
Note... the safety instantly retreated 10 yards even further backwards off the snap for a run that went for 15... -
(4) Washington @ Stanford PAC-10 W 42. 7
(4) Washington @. (9)Â Nebraska Big 8. W. 36 21
(4)Â Washington Kansas State Big 8. W 56 3
(3)Â Washington Arizona Pac-10. W. 54. 0
(3)Â Washington Toledo MAC W. 48. 0
(3)Â Washington @. (7)Â California Pac-10. W. 24. 17
(3)Â Washington Oregon Pac-10. W. 29. 7
(3)Â Washington Arizona State Pac-10. W. 44. 16
(2)Â Washington @. USC. Pac-10. W. 14. 3
(3)Â Washington @. Oregon State Pac-10. W. 58. 6
(2)Â Washington Wash State Pac-10. W. 56. 21
(2)Â Washington N. (4)Â Michigan Big Ten. W. 34. 14
imagine destroying a blue blood (at the time) on the road who was ranked 9th in the country and not moving up one spot.
in a season long popularity contest to decide a champion. What a system.
I think didn't move up because we were down to Nebraska going into the 4th (before outscoring 20-0 in last quarter)...... and 1-3 were idle that week but 1) FSU had just won 58-0 and 2)Miami beat 10)Houston by 30 and 3) Michigan had beat 7) Notre Dame. -
I stand by my prediction. It will be the mother of all blowouts. Michigan is on fire ... ð¥Qruel said:
Maybe if Michigan acquires UW's signs. Dude, the best offense Michigan faced all year ranks like 40th in the country. UW will score more than fucking 10 points against the Cheaterines. They'll sell out to stop the run much more than how they defended against Texas as well. I hope Michigan players/coaches are thinking it will be as much of a cakewalk as you do.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð -
The most Damone post, ever.BlueWeasel said:
I stand by my prediction. It will be the mother of all blowouts. Michigan is on fire ... ð¥Qruel said:
Maybe if Michigan acquires UW's signs. Dude, the best offense Michigan faced all year ranks like 40th in the country. UW will score more than fucking 10 points against the Cheaterines. They'll sell out to stop the run much more than how they defended against Texas as well. I hope Michigan players/coaches are thinking it will be as much of a cakewalk as you do.BlueWeasel said:Howdy Everybody!
I can hardly wait for the big game but must say that I feel fairly confident that Michigan will win, primarily because of their D.
No matter what the outcome is, I'm sure we can all be grateful to have so much fun with this silly college football stuff taking our minds off the seriousness of the troubled world, if only for a little while.
I, btw, used to live up there in the Great North West in the days Dixie Lee Ray and Cliff Lens and Shirley Hudson and --of course! -- the great Don James! (Who did some mean things to my Michigan team back then, sad to say.ð)
Michigan 43, Washington 10!ð€ ð
