Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm i the only negadawg left?

2

Comments

  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    MikeDamone said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.

    Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
    That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.

    Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.

    HTH.
    Omg if you use your stupid golf analogy one more time I'll blow my brains out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    The offense scored 6 points. The the tallest midget in the offensive circus won.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    MikeDamone said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.

    Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.
    That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.

    Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.

    HTH.
    The Holiday Bowl loss to KSU in 99 brought me relief ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    MikeDamone said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    MikeDamone said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    MikeDamone said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.

    Bowl win (assumed).

    Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
    Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.
    Actually, I'm not.

    Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........

    Stanford - no
    Oregon - no
    UCLA - no
    Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
    WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up


    Are you fucking retarded?
    Perhaps.

    Have you watched any of the last 5 games?


    It was better before the edit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    MikeDamone said:

    some of you assholes have lost your edge. 5 games in we know what they are. If sark was still coach we would be all on his shit. 5-4 (at best) is happening. Peterman gets some grace because he has actually done it before and he's not sark, but jesus.

    I would have fired him at the 50 yard line after the fake punt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,216
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    MikeDamone said:

    some of you assholes have lost your edge. 5 games in we know what they are. If sark was still coach we would be all on his shit. 5-4 (at best) is happening. Peterman gets some grace because he has actually done it before and he's not sark, but jesus.

    I would have fired him at the 50 yard line after the fake punt.
    Yeah yeah, you'd also fire Saban for hiring Lane Kiffin. We get it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    His silence to this comment speaks volumes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    Compared to the Big Sky quality team they had last year, it's good coaching.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    Can't they just be happy with 3-1? Unless you're saying how you win matters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,216
    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    Sark would probably kill a hooker to get that close to winning in Arizona
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    MikeDamone said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    Can't they just be happy with 3-1? Unless you're saying how you win matters.
    How you lose matters too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited September 2014
    topdawgnc said:

    MikeDamone said:

    topdawgnc said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"

    Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked.

    The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.
    Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.
    Sven says everyone is terrible.
    This. The day Sven has something good to say about a coach I will probably hurl myself off the Aurora bridge because it probably means the world is going to end.
    I really like what @SonnyDykes‌ is doing at Cal this year.
    Beating Colorado in 2 OT and losing to Arizona on a hail mary is always special
    Can't they just be happy with 3-1? Unless you're saying how you win matters.
    How you lose matters too.
    I believe I have said that... Many times.

    By the way..have you ever heard my golf analogy?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    MikeDamone said:

    Maybe 23 fucking years of this shit has me a bit jaded. Fuck off and FYFMFE.

    Jesus. A lifetime after 1991 and I see a loss like that to FUCKING Stanford at FUCKING HOME where the offense has less than 200 yard and the team has close to 100 yards in penalties. Time for me to do what race did and MOVE and become a UCLA fan.

    I shudder to admit this, but the days of old that negadawgs (Damone & FYFMFE) want to see return to UW probably never will. Program has been down too long and too much has changed in college football. Husky football superiority is not likely to return. The new standard is respectability. That is the high bar.

    I don't like this. Not at all. But a 4-0 scrimmage record and 0-1 in games that matter, and how badly the Huskies looked (except defense) yesterday, reveals where the program is at in the first year of Pete.

    Petersen will get the program to respectability. This means conference championships, Rose Bowls, and maybe a shot at a national title. Eventually. But, not a dynasty. And, respectability will not likely be soon enough for me, Damone, and negadawgs.

    This is how I see it. I want it to be otherwise, and hope to be proven wrong. But, adjusting expectations may make the pain more endurable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited September 2014
    Homebrew_Dawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Maybe 23 fucking years of this shit has me a bit jaded. Fuck off and FYFMFE.

    Jesus. A lifetime after 1991 and I see a loss like that to FUCKING Stanford at FUCKING HOME where the offense has less than 200 yard and the team has close to 100 yards in penalties. Time for me to do what race did and MOVE and become a UCLA fan.

    I shudder to admit this, but the days of old that negadawgs (Damone & FYFMFE) want to see return to UW probably never will. Program has been down too long and too much has changed in college football. Husky football superiority is not likely to return. The new standard is respectability. That is the high bar.

    I don't like this. Not at all. But a 4-0 scrimmage record and 0-1 in games that matter, and how badly the Huskies looked (except defense) yesterday, reveals where the program is at in the first year of Pete.

    Petersen will get the program to respectability. This means conference championships, Rose Bowls, and maybe a shot at a national title. Eventually. But, not a dynasty. And, respectability will not likely be soon enough for me, Damone, and negadawgs.

    This is how I see it. I want it to be otherwise, and hope to be proven wrong. But, adjusting expectations may make the pain more endurable.
    As you describe it, that will be enough for me. UW has never been a dynasty. Conference championships, rose bowls and maybe a shot at the nc is all UW has ever had.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Homebrew_Dawg said:

    MikeDamone said:

    Maybe 23 fucking years of this shit has me a bit jaded. Fuck off and FYFMFE.

    Jesus. A lifetime after 1991 and I see a loss like that to FUCKING Stanford at FUCKING HOME where the offense has less than 200 yard and the team has close to 100 yards in penalties. Time for me to do what race did and MOVE and become a UCLA fan.

    I shudder to admit this, but the days of old that negadawgs (Damone & FYFMFE) want to see return to UW probably never will. Program has been down too long and too much has changed in college football. Husky football superiority is not likely to return. The new standard is respectability. That is the high bar.

    I don't like this. Not at all. But a 4-0 scrimmage record and 0-1 in games that matter, and how badly the Huskies looked (except defense) yesterday, reveals where the program is at in the first year of Pete.

    Petersen will get the program to respectability. This means conference championships, Rose Bowls, and maybe a shot at a national title. Eventually. But, not a dynasty. And, respectability will not likely be soon enough for me, Damone, and negadawgs.

    This is how I see it. I want it to be otherwise, and hope to be proven wrong. But, adjusting expectations may make the pain more endurable.
    If it doesn't happen soon enough under Peterman, it's not going to happen under Peterman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,147
    edited September 2014
    I have some concerns, but we might end up a decent team. I'm still not quite sure what we have. I never expected us to be great. I maybe expected us to be a little better, but 11-3 or 10-4 was pretty much always the expectation from most here.

    There is a bye week for the offense to get it in gear. I think they will. They won't be great, but they can be efficient. The defense has steadily improved and hopefully it continues. Hopefully that was the low point of the season. I don't think this team has a lot of gimme wins, but I don't think we will be a pushover to anyone either. I'm not throwing in the towel yet. I expected us to lose to Stanford and we did. They are good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I have some concerns, but we might end up a decent team. I'm still not quite sure what we have. I never expected us to be great. I maybe expected us to be a little better, but 11-3 or 10-4 was pretty much always the expectation from most here.

    There is a bye week for the offense to get it in gear. I think they will. They won't be great, but they can be efficient. The defense has steadily improved and hopefully it continues. Hopefully that was the low point of the season. I don't think this team has a lot of gimme wins, but I don't think we will be a pushover to anyone either. I'm not throwing in the towel yet. I expected us to lose to Stanford and we did. They are good.

    I seem to remember you agreeing with Tequila and predicting 12-1 or 11-2. What happened?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    This is precisely the reason why you should take a page out of Oregon's book and schedule sturdier OOC opponents. You played 4 straight crappy ass opponents and your 5th opponent just happened to be the team with the cuntry's best defense. Not surprising that they ramrodded you with an iron boner. Scrimmage games that don't test you end up handicapping you. Get some balls and schedule some real OOC opponents.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    This is precisely the reason why you should take a page out of Oregon's book and schedule sturdier OOC opponents. You played 4 straight crappy ass opponents and your 5th opponent just happened to be the team with the cuntry's best defense. Not surprising that they ramrodded you with an iron boner. Scrimmage games that don't test you end up handicapping you. Get some balls and schedule some real OOC opponents.

    Using Oregon's OOC schedule in this argument was fucktarded.

    UCLA would have been a much better example.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited September 2014
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    This is precisely the reason why you should take a page out of Oregon's book and schedule sturdier OOC opponents. You played 4 straight crappy ass opponents and your 5th opponent just happened to be the team with the cuntry's best defense. Not surprising that they ramrodded you with an iron boner. Scrimmage games that don't test you end up handicapping you. Get some balls and schedule some real OOC opponents.

    Using Oregon's OOC schedule in this argument was fucktarded.

    UCLA would have been a much better example.
    I'm not going by this year alone but rather by Oregon's history of scheduling tough ass OOC opponents like LSU, Michigan State, Georgia (who bailed on us), Texas A & M and Ohio State. UCLA scheduled Virginia, Memphis and Texas. All shit teams.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    This is precisely the reason why you should take a page out of Oregon's book and schedule sturdier OOC opponents. You played 4 straight crappy ass opponents and your 5th opponent just happened to be the team with the cuntry's best defense. Not surprising that they ramrodded you with an iron boner. Scrimmage games that don't test you end up handicapping you. Get some balls and schedule some real OOC opponents.

    Using Oregon's OOC schedule in this argument was fucktarded.

    UCLA would have been a much better example.
    I'm not going by this year alone but rather by Oregon's history of scheduling tough ass OOC opponents like LSU, Michigan State, Georgia (who bailed on us), Texas A & M and Ohio State. UCLA scheduled Virginia, Memphis and Texas. All shit teams.
    Scheduling three opponents with a pulse >>>>> scheduling one team that way above its historical norm and two teams that are just like the teams UW scheduled this year.

    You're not good at this at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter