I'm i the only negadawg left?
Comments
-
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
This.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
The sky is not falling. If we lose to UCLA, ASU, Zona, and Oregon, then the sky is falling and we will likely suck forever -
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
-
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
-
All this said...I need to give the classic HHB line "I hope I'm wrong and petersen runs the table".
-
That's for the bigger picture. I'm just talking about this year.allpurpleallgold said:
Damone is a panicky little bitch. HTH.EsophagealFeces said:What happened to 15 games, win or GTFO, Dabone? I'm not happy with what I've seen so far, but everything in Chris Petersen's history would lead me to believe that he's capable of figuring this shit out.
Have I mentioned how they win or lose matters? I was never more optimistic about UW football than after the 1990 loss to Colorado.
HTH. -
Isn't the Sven line that Stanford is terrible? Sounds like you're off the reservation.allpurpleallgold said:
The problem is the "way we have looked" is a 7 point loss to a quality opponent. That's why you guys sound dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Damone is right. If it were Sark, there would be a ton of, "WE'RE STUCK WITH THIS PUSSY FOR 10 MORE YEARS! I'M JUMPING OFF THE AURORA BRIDGE NOW!"
Petersen is an upgrade. He will probably do really good things. Yes I'm glad Sark is gone. But who here expected this after five games? I'm not talking about the record. I'm talking about the way they have looked. -
Are you fucking retarded?MikeDamone said:
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up -
Beat Oregon. Nothing else matters.
Possibly true this year. A lot of fans,players, and recruits would buy in and work harder than ever
We need to change the mojo. iDawg and I were concerned in 2007 that losing would become permanent here. Its easier to go from good to bad than to get back -
Perhaps.allpurpleallgold said:
Are you fucking retarded?MikeDamone said:
Actually, I'm not.allpurpleallgold said:
Christ. You're better than that. That (assumed) bowl win gives us 10 wins because of your (assumed) conference record.MikeDamone said:
Bowl win (assumed).allpurpleallgold said:5-4 in conference and a bowl win is a 10 win year.
Who was the Doog that argued that way in 2012. Saying sark won 9 games that year before the apple cup. The last two wins were (assumed)
Give me your 5 wins.....here's mine: Cal, ASU, CU,OSU...........
Stanford - no
Oregon - no
UCLA - no
Az - maybe, but history on the road says no
WSU- If UW can score 60 then a win. WSU will have 600 yards offense. Toss up
Have you watched any of the last 5 games?
