Stanford wrap-up
Comments
-
Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming. -
I remember the good old days when Kim told us that Wilcox and Sark were recruiting defensive players to build a D that could stop zone read offenses but would struggle against pro-style, power offenses.RaceBannon said:Some people forget that our defense always looks good against Stanford
Hi Kim! -
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
*dominanthaie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominate D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. They're offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
*their -
Washington got 4 carries. Coleman had 14. It's 79 to 49 for the season. Coleman has played better for the most part and has been rewarded for it. Who starts isn't as important as who gets the bulk of the carries.Disciple_2_Hole said:
Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming.
I disagree about Shaq/Jeff. The first time Jeff came in, Hall went for a 10 yard gain. The first play Shaq was in was a fake handoff that ended up being a fumble. Petersen was pissed about Lindquist closing his eyes and hucking it deep. He said it was a misread.
As for the rest of the offense, APAG had it right. It was all bad. Miles, the running game, the OL, the WR's, the play calling. It all sucked. -
Abundance.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out. -
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
It was hard to see if/how often the receivers were open during the game because I kept looking at Miles flailing around in the backfield and holding into the ball too long. A few passes were FS, like throwing to Coleman in traffic for 3 yards (WOW!). Offensive line has a Cozzetto hangover and a talent deficiency since 2000. I'm 27 and am tired of seeing fat fucks like Casey Bulyca and James Atoe, who never met a doughnut he didn't like.
I didn't see any of the players yelling at Miles a la Kasen, so if anybody can poast what they saw TIA.
Figure it out Peterman. -
@Swaye
May I suggest Vodka Cran.
I know it's not the usual hangover dog but bloody mary and driver have too much acid.
Try it. -
Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.haie said:
I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.dnc said:
disagreeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.allpurpleallgold said:
And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.MisterEm said:
Disagree.allpurpleallgold said:There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.
They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.
The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.
HTH
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
