Stanford wrap-up

Swaye

Almost died drinking last night in a useless attempt to make Cyler play worth a fuck. Passed out in the 4th, and thankfully never even saw the fake punt of Miles fucktarded play. Getting on a plane to Boston with a fucking shitshow of a hangover. All for nothing. FYFMFE.

For anyone talking shit on Smith for play calling, what the fuck do you expect? When you have a QB you know can't consistently make D1 throws downfield, never makes it past the first read in a progression, and starts running for his life when nobody is within 7 yards of him, how do you game plan around that?

I have the 4th quarter recorded, but I might just say fuck it and wait for the HH podcast to have that shitshow dissected.

D played great, from what I recall. Which isn't much past halftime. ST was sort of shitty (surprised me). At the end of the day, either we need to go with a different QB, or Miles needs to "get it." With yesterday's QB play we are a 7 win team, even with a punishing and tenacious D. Sark is a great recruiter, everyone says so. My useless as fuck .02. I need to get to Boston quick so I can drink this hangover away. Fuck off.

allpurpleallgold

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

MisterEm

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

dnc

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

Good thing he specifically said he was talking about the offense.

EsophagealFeces

We're just lucky that Swaye is alive enough to poast here at all.

allpurpleallgold

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

TierbsHsotBoobs

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

dnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

RaceBannon

Some people forget that our defense always looks good against Stanford

TierbsHsotBoobs

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

dnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

It was a terrible loss, and it certainly means they're not great, but that's still a good team.

Disciple_2_Hole

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.

How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

RaceBannon said:

Some people forget that our defense always looks good against Stanford

I remember the good old days when Kim told us that Wilcox and Sark were recruiting defensive players to build a D that could stop zone read offenses but would struggle against pro-style, power offenses.

Hi Kim!

haie

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.

PurpleBaze

haie said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominate D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. They're offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.

*dominant

*their

RoadDawg55

Disciple_2_Hole said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Outside of the QB, on offense I was high on DWash at tb before the season but for the life of me I have no idea why he deserved to start vs Stanford. LColeman should be the first option because he runs downhill while DW and his clear fumbling issues would be a better change of back/2nd option.

How the fuck does this team not have one NFL QB in the wings after having an all-world recruiter/QB coach-OC as a shit HC after 5 years? Jeff getting snaps yesterday was stupid when Stanford was smart enough to know if Shaq/Jeff entered the game it was 81% likely the run was coming.

Washington got 4 carries. Coleman had 14. It's 79 to 49 for the season. Coleman has played better for the most part and has been rewarded for it. Who starts isn't as important as who gets the bulk of the carries.

I disagree about Shaq/Jeff. The first time Jeff came in, Hall went for a 10 yard gain. The first play Shaq was in was a fake handoff that ended up being a fumble. Petersen was pissed about Lindquist closing his eyes and hucking it deep. He said it was a misread.

As for the rest of the offense, APAG had it right. It was all bad. Miles, the running game, the OL, the WR's, the play calling. It all sucked.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Abundance.

TierbsHsotBoobs

haie said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.

Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.

biak1

It was hard to see if/how often the receivers were open during the game because I kept looking at Miles flailing around in the backfield and holding into the ball too long. A few passes were FS, like throwing to Coleman in traffic for 3 yards (WOW!). Offensive line has a Cozzetto hangover and a talent deficiency since 2000. I'm 27 and am tired of seeing fat fucks like Casey Bulyca and James Atoe, who never met a doughnut he didn't like.

I didn't see any of the players yelling at Miles a la Kasen, so if anybody can poast what they saw TIA.

Figure it out Peterman.

mobey

@‌Swaye

May I suggest Vodka Cran.

I know it's not the usual hangover dog but bloody mary and driver have too much acid.

Try it.

RoadDawg55

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

haie said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

allpurpleallgold said:

MisterEm said:

allpurpleallgold said:

There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

Disagree.

The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

HTH

And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.

Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.

disagree

Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.

I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.

Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.

Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.