Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stanford wrap-up

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    haie said:

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.
    Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.
    Somehow with Shaw, they've made 3 straight BCS bowls. They have a tough schedule this year, but they are a good team.
    They weren't a good team last year and they're worse this year.

    Hope this helps.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,875 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.
    Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.
    dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimes

    Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    haie said:

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.
    Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.
    dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimes

    Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
    He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.
    He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
    He's already lost at home to Sark this year.

    HTH
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Sounds terrible. It's fucking Stanford man, they're a woman's basketball and water polo school.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,875 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.
    Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.
    dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimes

    Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
    He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.
    He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
    He's already lost at home to Sark this year.

    HTH
    Dude you are the type of guy that probably critiques a 10/10 for having a mole on her fucking shoulder
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    The annoyer of all is really fucking annoying today.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.

    This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,535 Founders Club
    Stanford is good, but not that good. They were good enough to expose a lot of our weaknesses, but that wasn't last year's Stanford. Definitely not Harbaugh's Stanford. So maybe that just goes to show how far we have to go. Luckily, we have a coach that can get us to improve over the course of the season. I still think we can win 10 games this year. Maybe it's the doog in me, but I haven't been impressed with many teams in the Pac-12 and I think we have a shot at a decent conference record.

    Also, I think it should be said that Pete needs another offseason to really get these guys playing at (or somewhere closer to) the level that we expect them to. He knows what excellence looks like and what we need to do to get there.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,875 Swaye's Wigwam

    Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.

    This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.

    Lloyd Carr won an NC, and was probably the ceiling of the Michigan program in modernity.

    I bet Michigan fans would've LOVED to have Carr these past 7 seasons, App State game be damned.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,535 Founders Club
    If Harbaugh was still coaching that Stanford team, they run us out of the fucking stadium. Simple fact.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.

    This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.

    Lloyd Carr inherited a NC, and was probably the ceiling of the Michigan program in modernity.

    I bet Michigan fans would've LOVED to have Carr these past 7 seasons, App State game be damned.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    haie said:

    dnc said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    disagree

    Good Pac-12 teams don't lose at home to Sark.

    Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
    I'll still take Stanford's D over every pac12 offense this season. Dominant D-line, best open-field tackling by a mile, always in position to make a play. Their offense isn't special but it doesn't need to be. Shaw being arrogant against USC doesn't change that.
    Unless Stanford fired Shaw, they're still fucked.
    dude you are fucking legitimately retarded sometimes

    Shaw isn't perfect, but he's way better than you give him credit for.
    He set the 2012 national championship on fire by playing Nunes.
    He backed into choking the Rose Bowl last year.
    He's already lost at home to Sark this year.

    HTH
    Dude you are the type of guy that probably critiques a 10/10 for having a mole on her fucking shoulder
    Stanford under Shaw has never been a 10.

    HTH
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,535 Founders Club

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    Yes they are. Get some perspective on our conference.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,551 Founders Club
    Made it to Boston. Took a cab from the airport and told the cabby take me to the shittiest dive Irish Pub in town. Took me to a little shit hole place where I straight pummeled three Irish Car Bombs. I feel right as rain now.

    While there, the juke box starts playing some bullshit folk crap, but somethign about the song feels good. Maybe because she calls him Sailor. I think Stanford and all the recent blackouts have fucked me up. Thank God it's a fuckign bye week.

    I share it now so Boobs can call it the hippie Nickleback.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFgagxTz3sE
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    PurpleJ said:

    MisterEm said:

    There's plenty of blame to go around on the offense. Everyone thinks they're a football genius and can correctly diagnose what exactly the problem was. It's Miley, it's the line, it's the playcalling. Blah blah blah. Nothing was good enough.

    They have a bye week to figure this out. The past decade plus the bye week deserved a "can we beat bye" joke. Now we have a real football coach that you can expect to utilize the bye and fix things. And he better or it's going to be door ass out.

    Disagree.

    The defense played well enough and the bye week will not "fix" an anemic offense.

    HTH
    And yet 0 bye weeks was enough for the defense to go from not being able to stop a division 2 school to getting praise about how they played well enough to win against a good PAC-12 team.
    Stanford is not a good Pac-12 team.
    Yes they are. Get some perspective on our conference.
    Fair poont
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,449 Swaye's Wigwam
    Swaye said:

    Made it to Boston. Took a cab from the airport and told the cabby take me to the shittiest dive Irish Pub in town. Took me to a little shit hole place where I straight pummeled three Irish Car Bombs. I feel right as rain now.

    While there, the juke box starts playing some bullshit folk crap, but somethign about the song feels good. Maybe because she calls him Sailor. I think Stanford and all the recent blackouts have fucked me up. Thank God it's a fuckign bye week.

    I share it now so Boobs can call it the hippie Nickleback.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFgagxTz3sE

    I can't believe that passes for music. Fuckin hipsters.
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Considering what Shaw inherited from Harbaugh, his run has been disappointing.

    This bored has apparently never heard of Lloyd Carr and Larry Coker.

    Lloyd Carr inherited a NC, and was probably the ceiling of the Michigan program in modernity.

    I bet Michigan fans would've LOVED to have Carr these past 7 seasons, App State game be damned.
    Bo never won a MNC.
  • UWerentThereManUWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475
    edited September 2014
    Swaye said:

    Almost died drinking last night in a useless attempt to make Cyler play worth a fuck. Passed out in the 4th, and thankfully never even saw the fake punt of Miles fucktarded play. Getting on a plane to Boston with a fucking shitshow of a hangover. All for nothing. FYFMFE.

    For anyone talking shit on Smith for play calling, what the fuck do you expect? When you have a QB you know can't consistently make D1 throws downfield, never makes it past the first read in a progression, and starts running for his life when nobody is within 7 yards of him, how do you game plan around that?

    I have the 4th quarter recorded, but I might just say fuck it and wait for the HH podcast to have that shitshow dissected.

    D played great, from what I recall. Which isn't much past halftime. ST was sort of shitty (surprised me). At the end of the day, either we need to go with a different QB, or Miles needs to "get it." With yesterday's QB play we are a 7 win team, even with a punishing and tenacious D. Sark is a great recruiter, everyone says so. My useless as fuck .02. I need to get to Boston quick so I can drink this hangover away. Fuck off.

    image
    did OP make it to Boston?
Sign In or Register to comment.