Precedent
Comments
-
HHusky said:
The Colorado Supreme Court already drew Daddy a roadmap for how to remain on the primary ballot. You fake outrage girls are amusing.

-
This Colorado thing aside, why do you think Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with insurrection?HHusky said:The Colorado Supreme Court already drew Daddy a roadmap for how to remain on the primary ballot. You fake outrage girls are amusing.
-
Faced with a beyond a reasonable doubt burden of proof, prosecutors pick and choose what to charge all the time. Abe Lincoln's advised lawyers not to plead everything they possibly can, and most of us try to adhere to that.Bob_C said:
This Colorado thing aside, why do you think Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with insurrection?HHusky said:The Colorado Supreme Court already drew Daddy a roadmap for how to remain on the primary ballot. You fake outrage girls are amusing.
-
Sounds like it can't be proven that Trump committed insurrection
H once again
-
They kill you for own goals in South America.RaceBannon said:Sounds like it can't be proven that Trump committed insurrection
H once again
-
Daddy isn't being charged with every felony he committed.
Sweet victory!
congrats -
They declined to charge him on the worst one. Talk about an over sell.HHusky said:Daddy isn't being charged with every felony he committed.
Sweet victory!
congrats -
We've been through this how many times? How many times you gonna drag out the same tired lies? Someone wanna bump the thread where we littered H's corpse with quotes from the founders?HHusky said:
Yeah, they were obviously just joking about a "well regulated militia".Sledog said:
They didn't extend the 2nd far enough to get back to the founders meaning. You really are bad at this. The Close Cover Before Striking School of Law and Heavy Machinery, must not have been very good.HHusky said:
I'm willing to be pleasantly surprised, but I predict SCOTUS will either duck the merits or butcher the 14th Amendment in the same way they butchered the 2nd. I'm betting they'll duck the merits.Goduckies said:
The only partisans were the 4 colorado judges.... this should be a 9 0 rebukingHHusky said:
I would never underestimate the partisan cowardice of this Supreme Court.Sources said:
Way to narrow it down. SCOTUS will take it from here, kidHHusky said:I'd ignore the GOP participants in these lawsuits too if I were you.
Anyway, CREW is either correct about the precedent or it is not. Feel free to show their error.
You won't, of course.
I already told you gals you probably have nothing to worry about.
They might get 9-0 if they duck the merits. I doubt very much they'll get a 9-0 vote on the merits. -
And he hasn't been convicted of anythingHHusky said:Daddy isn't being charged with every felony he committed.
Sweet victory!
congrats
Sweet victory indeed -
Question for the lawyers, if Trump was charged with insurrection and was found not guilty, would this 14th amendment application still apply?



