Home› Duck Refuge

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Arizona was the tougher opponent...

bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
in Duck Refuge
but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    Ok, stalker boy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,519 Founders Club
    more retarded takes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
    edited December 2023
    Fifita is the better quarterback, so I was told.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
    ntxduck said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions
    He’s on IPA #3 and he’s a lightweight.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheRoarOfTheCrowdTheRoarOfTheCrowd Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,684 Founders Club
    edited December 2023
    Even I think so, this is the game we have all been waiting for since the toss up game in Seattle ~ these are two good teams, bring it on....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

    Fuck off you stupid cunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    ntxduck said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions
    Seems convenient.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

    Fuck off you stupid cunt.
    Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    bisonduck said:

    but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

    "They're"?

    I'm pointing out a fact.

    The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

    The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

    This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

    Sorry that hurts your snatch.
    JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

    Fuck off you stupid cunt.
    Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...
    The IPA is making you drift off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

    Makes sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    edited December 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

    Makes sense.

    Oregon wasn't there last year

    Retard
    They’ve been in the Championship game so many times it’s hard to remember the years they weren’t there
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Didn’t take long for RaceBiden to bite. I had money on Haie/FTJ. The pet retard of HH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,479 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Didn’t take long for RaceBiden to bite. I had money on Haie/FTJ. The pet retard of HH.

    Oh you were trolling

    Right
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,506 Swaye's Wigwam
    46XiJCAB said:

    Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

    Makes sense.

    Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

    Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

    Makes sense.

    Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

    Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.
    More conspiracy theories from haie.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bisonduckbisonduck Member Posts: 714
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

    Makes sense.

    Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

    Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.
    This is just dumb. The divisional rivalries typically weren't producing great matchups. UW vs Oregon is going to bring a lot more revenue than UA vs UW.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.