Arizona was the tougher opponent...

bisonduck

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

haie

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

bisonduck

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

Ok, stalker boy.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

more retarded takes

bisonduck

Fifita is the better quarterback, so I was told.

ntxduck

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions

bisonduck

ntxduck said:

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions

He’s on IPA #3 and he’s a lightweight.

DawgOfTheAges

Even I think so, this is the game we have all been waiting for since the toss up game in Seattle ~ these are two good teams, bring it on....

46XiJCAB

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.

haie

ntxduck said:

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

The fuck are you babbling about? Uga and Bama are in different divisions

Seems convenient.

haie

46XiJCAB said:

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.

Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...

bisonduck

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

haie said:

bisonduck said:

but now they're bitching about the CCG format. It's neurotic.

"They're"?

I'm pointing out a fact.

The SEC didn't want Bana and Georgia playing each other again, and the B1G didn't want Michigan and Ohio State playing each other again, with roughly the same size conferences.

The Big 12 has their system because they were 10 members and there's no point in changing it for one year.

This "dominant" Oregon team needed Washington to lose twice.

Sorry that hurts your snatch.

JFC FTJ, at least try to make sense. I’m old enough to remember when Doog fans were crying about shitty south division teams earning a spot in the CCG and wanting the divisions gone.

Fuck off you stupid cunt.

Of course the loser who was so depressed in October that he dipped and then found out months later that "his" team made it back to the championship would be upset...

The IPA is making you drift off.

46XiJCAB

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

RaceBannon

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard

SFGbob

RaceBannon said:

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard

They’ve been in the Championship game so many times it’s hard to remember the years they weren’t there

RaceBannon

SFGbob said:

RaceBannon said:

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Oregon wasn't there last year

Retard

They’ve been in the Championship game so many times it’s hard to remember the years they weren’t there

I'll keep track so you don't have to

46XiJCAB

Didn’t take long for RaceBiden to bite. I had money on Haie/FTJ. The pet retard of HH.

RaceBannon

46XiJCAB said:

Didn’t take long for RaceBiden to bite. I had money on Haie/FTJ. The pet retard of HH.

Oh you were trolling

Right

haie

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.

SFGbob

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.

More conspiracy theories from haie.

bisonduck

haie said:

46XiJCAB said:

Guess the “conference people” figured Oregon would always be 1 or 2 so dumping the divisions would guarantee the premier team in the PAC-12 would always be there.

Makes sense.

Their motivation was 100% "We can possibly get a rematch between UCLA and USC and squeeze as much money out of the game as possible"

Even if you're a giant quook you'd still have to admit that getting Utah and Captain Concussion back into the game was a massive backfiring and no one ended up giving a fuck about the game and the subsequent Rose scrimmage.

This is just dumb. The divisional rivalries typically weren't producing great matchups. UW vs Oregon is going to bring a lot more revenue than UA vs UW.