Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Duck Fans Feeling Confident
Comments
-
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
-
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
Oregon choked the only big game they playedbisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
You might want to beat the Beavers before you claim the betting line natty -
Yes, we are. You (Bison DUck) not so much.bisonduck said:
Lol. We are all entitled to our opinions.RaceBannon said:
It's not clear at allbisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
Oregon is getting their ass kicked
Thats clear
-
Now the league is no goodbisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
Fine
Texas, Bama, and the Ohio State Michigan loser all jump one loss Oregon -
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
UW is literally #1 in SOR. Possibly the most retarded take I've ever heardbisonduck said:
So, this battle tested theory is based on a playing OSU at home vs away since our last game. You got Arizona before our last game and when they didn't look as strong.Sources said:
Beav and Arizona (both on the road) vs Colorado and WSU (both at home for duckies)bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close. -
When you say stuff like that, you sound dumb.bisonduck said:
Our league isn't good outside of UW and Oregon. How is your schedule any harder? Sure, you got Arizona vs Colorado before our first game.TheHB said:
Disagree that it's clear UW has regressed. UW has played a difficult schedule, and I would say its defense is better prepared today than it was when it played Oregon. The offense is fine. Running game is better today than it was when UW played Oregon. Passing game is still strong, as well.bisonduck said:
I am not sure why people cannot tip the cap to Penix in that game and UW's defense for coming up strong in that game.FireCohen said:So Oregon did not lose they just ran out of time both times
I also cannot understand why UW fans have this persecution complex about Oregon fans and nation media confidence in a rematch. It's clear that UW has regressed and Oregon progressed. That's not to say that UW is going to get punked but the spread looks like it would be -7.5 in a rematch in Vegas. It might even be more after the Oregon State game.
These ideas are not mutually exclusive.
The "persecution" you speak of is all about the fact that Oregon fans and national media are so certain about this regression. I really hope the duck team thinks UW has regressed. In reality, the team is much tougher and battle-tested than it was the first time the teams played.
It's one thing to win a bunch of games 50-14, which is nice. But the first time you find yourself down a few points, that's when the strong find out what they're all about. Ducks didn't handle it well the last time. UW has.
If the spread is -7.5 in favor of Oregon, that's easy money for UW.
You are not more battle tested. You just have played close games that shouldn't have been close.
