Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
haie the pig farmer, I have a question for ya
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,188
Do you recall talking shit about how Oregon sucked because they only led Stanford by 8 at halftime? Is leading by 8 at halftime better or worse than leading by 2 with six minutes to go in the game?
Comments
-
How about leading by 2 with 5 minutes to go and then getting picked in the endzone? Is that better or worse than being up by 8 at the half?
-
Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin -
Another question, another Kunt dodge. You're the one who ran their twat of a mouth about how bad Oregon was for only leading Stanford by 8 at the half. I'm just asking if leading by 2 with under 3 mins in the game is worse? Of course you being the mouthy little bitch you are dodge the fucking question.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin -
1-6 turnover ratio the past two weeks and still:SFGbob said:
Another question, another Kunt dodge. You're the one who ran their twat of a mouth about how bad Oregon was for only leading Stanford by 8 at the half. I'm just asking if leading by 2 with under 3 mins in the game is worse? Of course you being the mouthy little bitch you are dodge the fucking question.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin
8-O
Winners win, losers have an absolute meltdown because they just beat a mountain west team. -
Meltdown? I'm here on the Oregon board talking shit with haie the pig fucker. You're the one who spent all your time here during your BIG victory lying your ass off and dodging questions like a Kunt.haie said:
1-6 turnover ratio the past two weeks and still:SFGbob said:
Another question, another Kunt dodge. You're the one who ran their twat of a mouth about how bad Oregon was for only leading Stanford by 8 at the half. I'm just asking if leading by 2 with under 3 mins in the game is worse? Of course you being the mouthy little bitch you are dodge the fucking question.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin
8-O
Winners win, losers have an absolute meltdown because they just beat a mountain west team.
If an 8 point lead at the half against Stanford is a sign that Oregon sucks, what's a 2 point lead with 3 mins to go mean pig fucker? -
It means that Washington is 8-O.SFGbob said:
Meltdown? I'm here on the Oregon board talking shit with haie the pig fucker. You're the one who spent all your time here during your BIG victory lying your ass off and dodging questions like a Kunt.haie said:
1-6 turnover ratio the past two weeks and still:SFGbob said:
Another question, another Kunt dodge. You're the one who ran their twat of a mouth about how bad Oregon was for only leading Stanford by 8 at the half. I'm just asking if leading by 2 with under 3 mins in the game is worse? Of course you being the mouthy little bitch you are dodge the fucking question.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin
8-O
Winners win, losers have an absolute meltdown because they just beat a mountain west team.
If an 8 point lead at the half against Stanford is a sign that Oregon sucks, what's a 2 point lead with 3 mins to go mean pig fucker?
Oregon beat a mountain west team.
Had a soul crushing loss in Seattle that you're still melting down from.
It's okay though, little bro wore white and silver/chrome uniforms just in case. No one will notice it was them when they replay it in Husky Stadium next year.
Meanwhile little bro will play 1994 Kenny Wheaton nonstop while losers like you jerk to it. -
I hear you talking more about Kenny Wheaton than any Oregon fan that frequents here. You're fixated on Oregon haie. During the entire fucking Stanford game you were here running your twat of a mouth.haie said:
It means that Washington is 8-O.SFGbob said:
Meltdown? I'm here on the Oregon board talking shit with haie the pig fucker. You're the one who spent all your time here during your BIG victory lying your ass off and dodging questions like a Kunt.haie said:
1-6 turnover ratio the past two weeks and still:SFGbob said:
Another question, another Kunt dodge. You're the one who ran their twat of a mouth about how bad Oregon was for only leading Stanford by 8 at the half. I'm just asking if leading by 2 with under 3 mins in the game is worse? Of course you being the mouthy little bitch you are dodge the fucking question.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin
8-O
Winners win, losers have an absolute meltdown because they just beat a mountain west team.
If an 8 point lead at the half against Stanford is a sign that Oregon sucks, what's a 2 point lead with 3 mins to go mean pig fucker?
Oregon beat a mountain west team.
Had a soul crushing loss in Seattle that you're still melting down from.
It's okay though, little bro wore white and silver/chrome uniforms just in case. No one will notice it was them when they replay it in Husky Stadium next year.
Meanwhile little bro will play 1994 Kenny Wheaton nonstop while losers like you jerk to it. -
Another thread, another haie the kunt dodge to the question he was asked.haie said:Another thread.
It's not a meltdown.
#WinnersWin -
"wE WeRe Up by nInE oVeR sTanFoRD wHeN yOu pIG fUcKeRS wErE oNlY uP bY tHrEE"
Not broken at all
-
The ass tonguer makes their appearance. Take it up with haie the pig fucker, he is the one that claimed that Oregon sucked because they only led Stanford by 8 at the half.
