Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Luckily we have inflation at only 3.7%
Comments
-
Carter lost in 80HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls.
Bush lost in 92
For someone who once claimed to have voted for Reagan your pretty ignorant about his first term
Voters could feel the improvement
Numbers say they feel Biden is failing badly -
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
Suck that dickHHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
-
The Evergreen State Econ Dept. must be so proud.RaceBannon said:
Suck that dickHHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
No GDP growth is an interesting campaign plank
-
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.HHusky said:
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
If wishes were horses . . .Bob_C said:
I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.HHusky said:
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls.
