Luckily we have inflation at only 3.7%

RaceBannon

BleachedAnusDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

SFGbob said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

You guysm been paying attention? Name the GOP candidates polling ahead of Biden currently.

Google was my source. Don't shoot the messenger. DeSantis was once the great hope to unseat Trump. Now it's Haley.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4210432-biden-trails-trump-haley-scott-in-2024-race-poll/

This board predicted Hailey after the first debate

If you want support for Ukraine she's the one.

I think she could beat Biden.

Big money is moving her way. Ron blew through 200 million for that poll drop

WestlinnDuck

Bob_C said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

SFGbob said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

You guysm been paying attention? Name the GOP candidates polling ahead of Biden currently.

Google was my source. Don't shoot the messenger. DeSantis was once the great hope to unseat Trump. Now it's Haley.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4210432-biden-trails-trump-haley-scott-in-2024-race-poll/

Ron tried to thread the needle on Ukraine, and it cost him second place. That's what my unnamed sources on the The Hill are saying. It's an open secret.

Haley is an eternal war advocate for Lockheed and Raytheon.

Bob_C

WestlinnDuck said:

Bob_C said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

SFGbob said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

You guysm been paying attention? Name the GOP candidates polling ahead of Biden currently.

Google was my source. Don't shoot the messenger. DeSantis was once the great hope to unseat Trump. Now it's Haley.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4210432-biden-trails-trump-haley-scott-in-2024-race-poll/

Ron tried to thread the needle on Ukraine, and it cost him second place. That's what my unnamed sources on the The Hill are saying. It's an open secret.

Haley is an eternal war advocate for Lockheed and Raytheon.

Yes, that's why she's going to finish second.

UW_Doog_Bot

RaceBannon said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

SFGbob said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

You guysm been paying attention? Name the GOP candidates polling ahead of Biden currently.

Google was my source. Don't shoot the messenger. DeSantis was once the great hope to unseat Trump. Now it's Haley.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4210432-biden-trails-trump-haley-scott-in-2024-race-poll/

This board predicted Hailey after the first debate

If you want support for Ukraine she's the one.

I think she could beat Biden.

Big money is moving her way. Ron blew through 200 million for that poll drop

Disagree.

Horse for another argument though.

RaceBannon

UW_Doog_Bot said:

RaceBannon said:

BleachedAnusDawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

SFGbob said:

Goduckies said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.

They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.

You guysm been paying attention? Name the GOP candidates polling ahead of Biden currently.

Google was my source. Don't shoot the messenger. DeSantis was once the great hope to unseat Trump. Now it's Haley.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4210432-biden-trails-trump-haley-scott-in-2024-race-poll/

This board predicted Hailey after the first debate

If you want support for Ukraine she's the one.

I think she could beat Biden.

Big money is moving her way. Ron blew through 200 million for that poll drop

Disagree.

Horse for another argument though.

I thought she did best on in debate 1

RaceBannon

Mortgage rates now highest since 2000

HHusky

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

UW_Doog_Bot

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

Where did inflation come from in 1984 Mardrid?

Did you want to take another victory lap on your math skills?

Bob_C

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

HHusky

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

Where did inflation come from in 1984 Mardrid?

Did you want to take another victory lap on your math skills?

You want to launch a campaign against hyperinflation!!! of 3.7%.

Good luck the rest of the way.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

Carter lost in 80

Bush lost in 92

For someone who once claimed to have voted for Reagan your pretty ignorant about his first term

Voters could feel the improvement

Numbers say they feel Biden is failing badly

HHusky

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

Suck that dick

RaceBannon

http://twitter.com/JosephTwohig/status/1709962610609627574?t=3JXURQM6usHWNGIinzj4vQ&s=19

http://twitter.com/Fearless45Trump/status/1707760489625706872?t=VE8lumLu7KgYqeKV4t4HQw&s=19

http://twitter.com/JohnMTillman/status/1708937797417971858?t=zaOp8ID6IAua4cALLo58xA&s=19

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

Suck that dick

The Evergreen State Econ Dept. must be so proud.

RaceBannon

No GDP growth is an interesting campaign plank

Bob_C

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

HHusky

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

Bob_C

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

HHusky

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

thechatch said:

Bob_C said:

Also this:

http://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1709187945356222746?s=20

In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

But we live in clown times.

Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

Take a Midol, girls.

1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?

Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?

You're right, best to stick with stagflation.

Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats

I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.

If wishes were horses . . .