Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Luckily we have inflation at only 3.7%

13

Comments

  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,004 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

    Take a Midol, girls.
    1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?
    Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?
    You're right, best to stick with stagflation.
    Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats
    I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.
    If wishes were horses . . .
    High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    Sources said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

    Take a Midol, girls.
    1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?
    Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?
    You're right, best to stick with stagflation.
    Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats
    I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.
    If wishes were horses . . .
    High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there
    Vote for Joe and get no growth and high inflation!

    It could work
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,902
    Sources said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

    Take a Midol, girls.
    1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?
    Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?
    You're right, best to stick with stagflation.
    Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats
    I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.
    If wishes were horses . . .
    High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there
    Bubbles are great . . . until they're not.

    You gals might want to take a remedial econ course or two.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,902

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,902

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.
    They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.
    And yet he's winning and has won

    It's all about winning

    Why would I support candidates 50 points behind him?

    Trump is the only one leading Biden

    You know who doesn't care about winning? Never Trumpers
    He is "winning" with GOP primary voters. Just like Bernie would have won with Rat Party primary voters. The DNC actually cares about winning National elections so they torpedoed Bernie, twice. You don't care about winning so you'll vote for Trump. You know how easily a Nikki Haley would beat Biden? But you don't care about winning you care about Trump.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
    You've already been humiliated on this

    Note
    Ignore all the inflation the first two years

    By all means run on the no growth high inflation platform
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Goduckies said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    And he will get reelected because the Trump will win the nomination... joy.
    They don't care. It's not about winning elections for the Trump crowd.
    And yet he's winning and has won

    It's all about winning

    Why would I support candidates 50 points behind him?

    Trump is the only one leading Biden

    You know who doesn't care about winning? Never Trumpers
    He is "winning" with GOP primary voters. Just like Bernie would have won with Rat Party primary voters. The DNC actually cares about winning National elections so they torpedoed Bernie, twice. You don't care about winning so you'll vote for Trump. You know how easily a Nikki Haley would beat Biden? But you don't care about winning you care about Trump.
    Trump is leading Biden and is closer to my issues

    She may be veep

    Trump is crushing her too. It's your party Bob

    McCain and Romney were winners too. Allegedly
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    Bob_C said:
    In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.

    But we live in clown times.
    Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?

    3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.

    Take a Midol, girls.
    1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?
    Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?
    You're right, best to stick with stagflation.
    Ducking the question was your best choice. Congrats
    I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.
    If wishes were horses . . .
    High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got there
    Bubbles are great . . . until they're not.

    You gals might want to take a remedial econ course or two.
    You've been shown your ass repeatedly.

    Take an econ class!?#

    Do you actually believe your own shtick?
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,569
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
    Willful idiot. Keep ignoring the massive inflation the two years prior. The damage is already done. We underwent more than a decade of inflation overnight, but now that it's 3.7% all is well?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 32,237

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
    Willful idiot. Keep ignoring the massive inflation the two years prior. The damage is already done. We underwent more than a decade of inflation overnight, but now that it's 3.7% all is well?
    Anyone who is shopping for food, fuel or has taken a look at their latest electric and NG bill knows the claim that inflation is at 3.7% is complete lie.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,018 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
    And to answer your question

    Yes I was
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing

    Found another cult

    Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.

    Condolences.
    Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflation

    I guess you missed the memo

    We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years

    No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!

    Bold strategy
    3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.

    We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
    I guess we'll ignore the 7-9 percent for two years and the unnecessary printing of 5 trillion supply chain issues, and 500 ships sitting in LA/Long Bitch Harbor for weeks
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,902
    Bloomberg Finance column today:

    The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”

    HHusky is always right. Just accept it.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,607 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bloomberg Finance column today:

    The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”

    HHusky is always right. Just accept it.

    Lol
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bloomberg Finance column today:

    The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”

    HHusky is always right. Just accept it.

    With 3.9% inflation. Yet you persist in your stupidity.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited October 2023
    HHusky said:

    Bloomberg Finance column today:

    The years from 2008 to 2020 were abnormal, even if at some point they came to feel normal, Slok says. The crew over at Bank of America dug up another historical nugget to underscore the point: Global interest rates during this period were the lowest in 5,000 years. “The new world that we live in,” Slok says, “is really the normal world that we were in.”

    Mr. Hands Up, Don’t Shoot is always WRONG. Just accept it.

Sign In or Register to comment.