Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Luckily we have inflation at only 3.7%
Comments
-
High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got thereHHusky said:
If wishes were horses . . .Bob_C said:
I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.HHusky said:
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls. -
Vote for Joe and get no growth and high inflation!Sources said:
High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got thereHHusky said:
If wishes were horses . . .Bob_C said:
I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.HHusky said:
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls.
It could work -
Bubbles are great . . . until they're not.Sources said:
High GDP growth is not guaranteed forever. Hence, you must be happy with economic downturns. Great thesis you’ve got thereHHusky said:
If wishes were horses . . .Bob_C said:
I'm fine with high real GDP growth forever.HHusky said:
Ducking the question was your best choice. CongratsBob_C said:
You're right, best to stick with stagflation.HHusky said:
Is there any economist who thinks a 7% GDP growth in a developed nation would be a good thing to see on an ongoing basis?Bob_C said:
1984 had 7% GDP growth. Are we getting that in 2024?HHusky said:
Did Reagan lose 48 or 50 states in 1984 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?thechatch said:
In normal times a POTUS performing like this would lose 48/50 states.Bob_C said:
But we live in clown times.
Did Bush1 lose 48 or 50 states in 1988 when inflation was higher than 3.7%?
3.7% is 0.6% higher than the average inflation rate since 1980. The sky is falling, of course.
Take a Midol, girls.
You gals might want to take a remedial econ course or two. -
Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing
Found another cult -
Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.RaceBannon said:Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing
Found another cult
Condolences. -
Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflationHHusky said:
Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.RaceBannon said:Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing
Found another cult
Condolences.
I guess you missed the memo
We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years
No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!
Bold strategy -
3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.RaceBannon said:
Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflationHHusky said:
Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.RaceBannon said:Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing
Found another cult
Condolences.
I guess you missed the memo
We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years
No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!
Bold strategy
We're you stoned for most of the past several decades? -
He is "winning" with GOP primary voters. Just like Bernie would have won with Rat Party primary voters. The DNC actually cares about winning National elections so they torpedoed Bernie, twice. You don't care about winning so you'll vote for Trump. You know how easily a Nikki Haley would beat Biden? But you don't care about winning you care about Trump.RaceBannon said:
And yet he's winning and has wonSFGbob said:
It's all about winning
Why would I support candidates 50 points behind him?
Trump is the only one leading Biden
You know who doesn't care about winning? Never Trumpers -
You've already been humiliated on thisHHusky said:
3.7% isn't high inflation ma'am.RaceBannon said:
Even the administration stopped the bullshit on temporary inflationHHusky said:
Two-plus percent growth and very temporary inflation that is now at unremarkable levels for anyone as old as you are, Dear.RaceBannon said:Under Biden no growth and the worst inflation since Carter is a GOOD thing
Found another cult
Condolences.
I guess you missed the memo
We'll ignore all the inflation that happened the first two years
No growth and high inflation! Bidenomics!
Bold strategy
We're you stoned for most of the past several decades?
Note
Ignore all the inflation the first two years
By all means run on the no growth high inflation platform
-
