Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

#MyPenix still underexposed

1234689

Comments

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,632 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    FireCohen said:

    A lot of dooging going on……can’t wait for this board drop an egg

    Or you could enjoy our most talented and best coached team since the early 90s.

    Your call.
    Abundance
    The schadenfreude of watching this place burn itself to the ground after a loss is the only thing that helps me manage my own desire to drink bleach when it inevitably happens.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,543 Swaye's Wigwam
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Doogles said:

    Defense is nowhere near 2016 levels.

    I think the talent across the board is greater on 2016.

    Can Penix and the motivated fat Boner make up the difference?

    Stay tuned.

    QB and WR's are better this year. WR is much deeper beyond the top-2 guys. IMO, all three starters this year are better than Pettis. QB is light years better.
    OL is better too. Penix got hit a little bit last week but he has all day to throw very often.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,098 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    FireCohen said:

    A lot of dooging going on……can’t wait for this board drop an egg

    Or you could enjoy our most talented and best coached team since the early 90s.

    Your call.
    Hang the banner!
    Wildly enough our? next opponent was Cal who we? beat by 7.
    Walter Bailey isn't leaping through that door anytime soon
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    whlinder said:

    Considering no injuries for each team, I think 2016 was more talented top to bottom (2023 slightly better WRs, slightly better Oline, and, well, QB) but the level of difference in QB play gives 2023 the edge.

    I'll take 2023 at EDGE also even with a healthy Mathis but I agree here. I might take 2023's TE's too though that's a really strong group on both teams.

    2016's big advantage besides defense was in the return game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,632 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    EsophagealFeces said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Neighbor2972 said:

    If Deboer and Grubb were coaching the '16 team I might take that roster over '23, but probably would just rather have Penix. With the Petersen offense, not a chance I would take '16.

    *sigh put Penix on the 2016 team throwing to Ross and Pettis...
    I honestly don’t think I would take Ross and Pettis over Rome, Polk, and Jalen.
    Nope, Ross is the best individually but 2023 is better at WR2, WR3, WR4, WR5, etc. Ross and Pettis were both small and got bullied by Bama, this receiving core would not get pushed around by that secondary.

    Penix throwing bombs to Ross would have been unfair though.
    Listen, you are all getting hung up on 2016 wr vs. 2023 wr.

    I just want to see the 2016 team without a noodle armed giraffe losing 20yds on a scramble play.

    Plus Penix throwing 60yd dimes to Ross would have been NFL level vs. College DB's. Would have been Culpepper to Moss levels of unfair.

    https://youtu.be/FTuNjsvPe4c?si=55mFZUdA2XCWNTos
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter