Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. That's fucking insane.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right?
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right? So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right? So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone? Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right? So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone? Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it. Pathetic
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right? So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone? Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it. Pathetic hard hitting commentarycarpet laying may have been your best option
Section 3No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.So about that conviction you don't have.....Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack Imagine believing your own eyes.No conviction required, as you’ve proven. Should be an easy case to bring and win then. He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them. It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean. So obvious you can't prove itSAD You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction. Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Now tie yourself in knots.As usual. You're holding on to that?Sad The Constitution?Nah?Who cares, right? So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone? Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it. Batshit
