Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Democrats File MORE LAWSUITS To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING To Win 2024

13

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,248 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    That's fucking insane.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    That's fucking insane.
    atta girl
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,248 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,574 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2023
    The funny thing about the insurrection is that no one has been charged with insurrection! The real insurrection occurred on Nov 3. Our election was stolen. The left along with foreign nations overthrew our government.

    Those folks will be off to Gitmo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.

    You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,482 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.

    You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
    Pathetic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,482 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    H is apparently
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.

    You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
    Pathetic
    hard hitting commentary

    carpet laying may have been your best option
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,482 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    The Constitution?

    Nah?

    Who cares, right?
    So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?
    Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.

    You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
    Pathetic
    hard hitting commentary

    carpet laying may have been your best option
    So no evidence still

    Got it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter