Democrats File MORE LAWSUITS To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING To Win 2024

DerekJohnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RguWRkNL7VU

HHusky

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

It's not that long.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

It's not that long.

So no conviction

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

It's not that long.

So no conviction

not yet

not required

you should get out more

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

It's not that long.

So no conviction

not yet

not required

you should get out more

Wrong

RaceBannon

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Bob_C

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

HHusky

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

We’ll see, won’t we?

Anyone else miss the days when self-described “conservatives” weren’t morons?

RoadTrip

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

Sledog

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

Link to a conviction?

You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

It's not that long.

So we can just say Joe overthrew the government with all the vote cheating and that was insurrection. Got it. We could do that for all demonrats.

You really are this stupid. You must be old because learning to be this dumb took tim!

HHusky

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

I've proven that a band of retards can't keep someone off the ballot

A conviction would prove your case would it not? What are you going to tell the judge? The J 6 committee said so?

Speaking of retards

Trump has not engaged in insurrection or rebellion. The enemies of the US are and were certainly not given comfort by Trump. Exactly the opposite

Now had Trump taken money from China to ruin domestic energy you might have a case. Wait that was Biden

Guess old Joe is disqualified. SAD

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

So obvious you can't prove it

SAD

Bob_C

HHusky said:

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

Sad.

Sources

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

So obvious you can't prove it

SAD

You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.

pawz

A Reichstag Fire is an insurrection.

Here’s looking at you, Nancy.

HHusky

Sources said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

So obvious you can't prove it

SAD

You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.

Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

Now tie yourself in knots.

As usual.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Sources said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RoadTrip said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


So about that conviction you don't have.....

Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

Imagine believing your own eyes.

No conviction required, as you’ve proven.

Should be an easy case to bring and win then.

He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.

It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.

So obvious you can't prove it

SAD

You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.

Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

Now tie yourself in knots.

As usual.

You're holding on to that?

Sad