Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Democrats File MORE LAWSUITS To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING To Win 2024

24

Comments

  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,240 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,574 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.

    Link to a conviction?
    You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.

    It's not that long.
    So we can just say Joe overthrew the government with all the vote cheating and that was insurrection. Got it. We could do that for all demonrats.

    You really are this stupid. You must be old because learning to be this dumb took tim!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    I've proven that a band of retards can't keep someone off the ballot

    A conviction would prove your case would it not? What are you going to tell the judge? The J 6 committee said so?

    Speaking of retards

    Trump has not engaged in insurrection or rebellion. The enemies of the US are and were certainly not given comfort by Trump. Exactly the opposite

    Now had Trump taken money from China to ruin domestic energy you might have a case. Wait that was Biden

    Guess old Joe is disqualified. SAD
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,246 Founders Club
    edited September 2023
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    Sad.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,381 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    A Reichstag Fire is an insurrection.

    Here’s looking at you, Nancy.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sources said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Section 3
    No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


    So about that conviction you don't have.....

    Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack

    Imagine believing your own eyes.

    No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
    Should be an easy case to bring and win then.
    He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.
    It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.
    So obvious you can't prove it

    SAD
    You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.
    Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.

    Now tie yourself in knots.

    As usual.
    You're holding on to that?

    Sad
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter