Democrats File MORE LAWSUITS To REMOVE Trump From 2024 Ballot, They Are CHEATING To Win 2024
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RguWRkNL7VUComments
-
Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
-
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
-
You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.RaceBannon said:
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
It's not that long. -
So no convictionHHusky said:
You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.RaceBannon said:
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
It's not that long. -
not yetRaceBannon said:
So no convictionHHusky said:
You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.RaceBannon said:
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
It's not that long.
not required
you should get out more -
WrongHHusky said:
not yetRaceBannon said:
So no convictionHHusky said:
You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.RaceBannon said:
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
It's not that long.
not required
you should get out more -
Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack -
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven. -
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven. -
We’ll see, won’t we?Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
Anyone else miss the days when self-described “conservatives” weren’t morons?
-
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven. -
So we can just say Joe overthrew the government with all the vote cheating and that was insurrection. Got it. We could do that for all demonrats.HHusky said:
You could actually read the 14th amendment. Conceivably.RaceBannon said:
Link to a conviction?HHusky said:Obviously disqualified himself. Yet probably better politically to just to let him get his ass kicked in the general.
It's not that long.
You really are this stupid. You must be old because learning to be this dumb took tim! -
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven. -
I've proven that a band of retards can't keep someone off the ballotHHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
A conviction would prove your case would it not? What are you going to tell the judge? The J 6 committee said so?
Speaking of retards
Trump has not engaged in insurrection or rebellion. The enemies of the US are and were certainly not given comfort by Trump. Exactly the opposite
Now had Trump taken money from China to ruin domestic energy you might have a case. Wait that was Biden
Guess old Joe is disqualified. SAD -
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD -
Sad.HHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
-
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD -
A Reichstag Fire is an insurrection.
Here’s looking at you, Nancy.
-
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual. -
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad -
That's fucking insane.HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual. -
atta girlBob_C said:
That's fucking insane.HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual. -
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right? -
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right? -
The funny thing about the insurrection is that no one has been charged with insurrection! The real insurrection occurred on Nov 3. Our election was stolen. The left along with foreign nations overthrew our government.
Those folks will be off to Gitmo. -
Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.Bob_C said:
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right?
You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it. -
PatheticHHusky said:
Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.Bob_C said:
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right?
You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it. -
H is apparentlyBob_C said:
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right? -
hard hitting commentaryRaceBannon said:
PatheticHHusky said:
Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.Bob_C said:
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right?
You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
carpet laying may have been your best option -
So no evidence stillHHusky said:
hard hitting commentaryRaceBannon said:
PatheticHHusky said:
Under our system, legal conclusions are drawn by courts. This doesn't require anyone be charged.Bob_C said:
So who is in charge of declaring the insurrections? Anyone?HHusky said:
The Constitution?RaceBannon said:
You're holding on to that?HHusky said:
Here's a clue: word search "conviction" in the 14th Amendment.Sources said:
You'd think a lawyer would understand insurrection is a crime, with elements, that have to be demonstrated, in a court, so that a jury, uh, could, ya know, issue a conviction.RaceBannon said:
So obvious you can't prove itHHusky said:
It’s just a pretty obvious case for a strict constructionist. Still probably better for Daddy to get his ass kicked, as usual. Politically speaking, I mean.RoadTrip said:
He'll be celebrating with his Piss Boy until everything gets turned over by the SCOTUS. Schumer will be calling on Antifa to murder them.Bob_C said:
Should be an easy case to bring and win then.HHusky said:
Imagine believing your own eyes.RaceBannon said:Section 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
So about that conviction you don't have.....
Just because some retards say he engaged in insurrection doesn't mean he did you fucking hack
No conviction required, as you’ve proven.
SAD
Now tie yourself in knots.
As usual.
Sad
Nah?
Who cares, right?
You were for the Federalist Society before you were against it.
carpet laying may have been your best option
Got it
